USE AND MISUSE OF MULTIPLE COMPARISONS IN ANIMAL-EXPERIMENTS

被引:61
作者
LOWRY, SR [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV KENTUCKY, LEXINGTON, KY 40546 USA
关键词
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; MULTIPLE COMPARISON TESTS;
D O I
10.2527/1992.7061971x
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The objective of many animal experiments is to detect meaningful relationships among treatments and associated responses. Types of comparisons of means include pairwise multiple comparisons, planned orthogonal or nonorthogonal contrasts, and orthogonal polynomials. Some procedures are appropriate only for specific types of treatment designs and specific types of objectives. Pairwise, multiple comparisons are appropriate only for comparing unstructured, qualitative treatments. Planned comparisons partition the overall set of treatment effects into independent or nonindependent subsets, with special application to factorials. Orthogonal polynomial (regression) procedures assess relationships between quantitative treatments and response when a full range of responses or an optimal dose is of interest. Recommendations for appropriate use of each mean comparison procedure are illustrated using data from three Journal of Animal Science articles. Also mentioned are a number of computer graphics packages that provide creative ways to display biological relationships and can be linked to statistical packages for input and to word processors or 35-mm cameras for output.
引用
收藏
页码:1971 / 1977
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
ALLEN OB, 1983, J ANIM SCI, V57, P765
[2]   MULTIPLE COMPARISONS FOR ORTHOGONAL CONTRASTS - EXAMPLES AND TABLES [J].
BECHHOFER, RE ;
DUNNETT, CW .
TECHNOMETRICS, 1982, 24 (03) :213-222
[3]   TYPE-I ERROR RATES WHEN MULTIPLE COMPARISON PROCEDURES FOLLOW A SIGNIFICANT F TEST OF ANOVA [J].
BERNHARDSON, CS .
BIOMETRICS, 1975, 31 (01) :229-232
[4]   MEASURES OF LACK OF FIT FOR RESPONSE-SURFACE DESIGNS AND PREDICTOR VARIABLE TRANSFORMATIONS [J].
BOX, GEP ;
DRAPER, NR .
TECHNOMETRICS, 1982, 24 (01) :1-8
[5]  
Carmer S. G., 1985, J AGRON ED, V14, P19
[6]   BABY BEARS DILEMMA - A STATISTICAL TALE [J].
CARMER, SG ;
WALKER, WM .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1982, 74 (01) :122-124
[7]   EVALUATION OF 10 PAIRWISE MULTIPLE COMPARISON PROCEDURES BY MONTE-CARLO METHODS [J].
CARMER, SG ;
SWANSON, MR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1973, 68 (341) :66-74
[8]   OPTIMAL SIGNIFICANCE LEVELS FOR APPLICATION OF LEAST SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE IN CROP PERFORMANCE TRIALS [J].
CARMER, SG .
CROP SCIENCE, 1976, 16 (01) :95-99
[9]   DETECTION OF DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MEANS - MONTE CARLO STUDY OF 5 PAIRWISE MULTIPLE COMPARISON PROCEDURES [J].
CARMER, SG ;
SWANSON, MR .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1971, 63 (06) :940-&
[10]  
CHEW V, 1976, HORTSCIENCE, V11, P348