COMPARISON OF BIPARIETAL DIAMETER MEASUREMENTS USING A REAL-TIME SCANNER AND A CONVENTIONAL SCANNER EQUIPPED WITH A CODED CEPHALOMETRY SYSTEM

被引：18

作者：

ADAM, AH

ROBINSON, HP

FLEMING, JEE

HALL, AJ

机构：

来源：

BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY | 1978年 / 85卷 / 07期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1111/j.1471-0528.1978.tb15619.x

中图分类号：

R71 [妇产科学];

学科分类号：

100211 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：487 / 491

页数：5

共 10 条

[1] CAMPBELL S, 1970, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Commonwealth, V77, P1057
[2] CAMPBELL S, 1968, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Commonwealth, V75, P568
[3] Campbell S, 1974, Clin Perinatol, V1, P507
[4] CAMPBELL S, 1974, LANCET, V1, P69
[5] CAMPBELL S, 1969, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Commonwealth, V76, P603
[6] COOPERBERG P L, 1976, Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, V4, P421, DOI 10.1002/jcu.1870040609
[7] DAVISON JM, 1973, J OBSTET GYN BR COMM, V80, P769
[8] COMPARISON BETWEEN LINEAR-ARRAY REAL-TIME ULTRASONIC-SCANNING AND CONVENTIONAL COMPOUND SCANNING IN MEASUREMENT OF FETAL BIPARIETAL DIAMETER
DOCKER, MF
SETTATREE, RS
[J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1977, 84 (12): : 924 - 929
[9] LUNT RM, 1974, J OBSTET GYN BR COMM, V81, P682
[10] ROBINSON HP, 1977, RECENT ADV OBSTETRIC, P239