PLACING PATIENTS IN THE QUEUE FOR CORONARY SURGERY - DO AGE AND WORK STATUS ALTER CANADIAN SPECIALISTS DECISIONS

被引:38
作者
NAYLOR, CD
LEVINTON, CM
BAIGRIE, RS
GOLDMAN, BS
机构
[1] the Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
[2] the Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
[3] the Department of Surgery, Cardiovascular Division, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
[4] the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
关键词
RATIONING; WAITING LISTS; APPROPRIATENESS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING; HEALTH POLICY; CORONARY REVASCULARIZATION; DECISION MAKING;
D O I
10.1007/BF02599450
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To determine the effects of age and work status on whether and where cardiovascular specialists would place hypothetical patients in the queue for coronary surgery. Materials and methods: Mailed survey presenting a set of clinical scenarios either to be rated on a scale with 7 time frames for urgency of need or to be designated as questionable/inappropriate for intervention. The basic scenario was a patient with mild - moderate stable angina, good left ventricular function, and limited coronary disease; operative risks and stress test results were varied Three identifiers were used "45 year old civil servant gainfully employed", "45-year-old laborer disabled by angina, faces job loss"; and "75-year-old retiree, angina limits golf." Participants: Cardiologists and cardiac surgeons practicing in five Ontario medical centers (n = 120). Results: There was a 59% response rate (120 usable responses). Large shifts in willingness to intervene occurred in favor of the disabled laborer (p < 0.0001) and against the retiree (p-value ranges from 0.04 to < 0.0001, depending on operative risk and stress test results), but not for the employed civil servant. Striking effects (p < 0.0001) were also evident in ratings of waiting time, with the order of priority being the disabled laborer first, the civil servant second, and the retiree last. The overall mean shift due to work status or age was equal to, or larger than, the mean shift due to clinical factors, such as stress test results, changes in severity of stable angina, and extent of coronary disease. Conclusion: Cardiovascular specialists may place considerable weight on age and work status in determining urgency and appropriateness of coronary revascularization. Risk - benefit concerns may partly explain shifting thresholds for intervention, but not differential waiting times. The influence of these factors should be sought in utilization audits and addressed from an ethical perspective.
引用
收藏
页码:492 / 498
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Naylor C.D., Baigrie R.S., Goldman B.S., Basinski A., Assessment of priority for coronary revascularization procedures, Lancet, 335, pp. 1070-3, (1990)
[2]  
Naylor C.D., Basinski A., Baigrie R.S., Goldman B.S., Lomas J., Placing patients in the queue for coronary revascularization: evidence for practice variations from an expert panel process, Am J Public Health, 80, pp. 1246-52, (1990)
[3]  
Brook R.H., Chassin, Fink A., Solomon D.H., Kosecoff J., Park R.E., A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies, Int J Tech Assess Health Care, 2, pp. 53-64, (1986)
[4]  
Park R.E., Fink A., Brook R.H., Et al., Physician ratings of appropriate indications for six medical and surgical procedures, Am J Public Health, 76, pp. 766-72, (1986)
[5]  
Chassin, Park R.E., Fink A., Et al., Indications for selected medical and surgical procedures—a literature review and ratings of appropriateness: coronary artery bypass graft surgery (RAND R-3204/2CWF/HF/PMT/RWJ), (1986)
[6]  
Naylor C.D., A different view of queues in Ontario, Health Aff (Millwood), 10, pp. 110-28, (1991)
[7]  
Naylor C.D., Levinton C.M., Baigrie R.S., Adapting to waiting lists for coronary revascularization: do Canadian specialists agree on which patients come first?, Chest, 101, pp. 715-22, (1992)
[8]  
Campeau L., Grading of angina pectoris [letter], Circulation, 54, pp. 522-3, (1976)
[9]  
Morris A.L., Roos L.L., Brazauskas R., Bedard D., Managing scarce services. A waiting list approach to cardiac catheterization, Med Care, 28, pp. 784-92, (1990)
[10]  
Naylor C.D., Linton A.L., Allocation of health care resources: a challenge for the medical profession, Can Med Assoc J, 134, pp. 333-40, (1986)