LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY AS A THEORETICAL BASIS FOR NATURE CONSERVATION

被引:56
作者
HANSSON, L
ANGELSTAM, P
机构
[1] UNIV UPPSALA, DEPT ZOOL, S-75105 UPPSALA, Sweden
[2] SWEDISH ENVIRONM PROTECT AGCY, GRIMSO WILDLIFE RES STN, S-73091 RIDDARHYTTAN, Sweden
关键词
LANDSCAPE CHANGE; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; CONSERVATION BIOLOGY; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; CLIMAX; SUCCESSION;
D O I
10.1007/BF00141434
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Conservation of representative biotopes, single species populations or biodiversity usually embraces two or more biotopes, and is often affected by surrounding croplands. The conclusions from landscape ecological studies can, therefore, offer important contributions to conservation, especially at early levels of landscape change or habitat fragmentation. Indicator and keystone species are useful for monitoring and managing fragmented biotopes, respectively. Communities as well as single species are affected by the juxtaposition of successional and climax biotopes, which influence climatic equability, seasonality, productivity and dispersal. Low levels of fragmentation may result in ill-functioning communities, and greater fragmentation may result in species losses and ultimately in the loss of whole communities. Fragmented habitats retain species with high reproductive and dispersal rates and generalized habitat selection. New combinations of interacting species will lead to trivialization of earlier habitat-specific interactions. Validation of these concepts was made with data from a Swedish research program on fragmented biotopes in production landscapes. General reserve selection and methods of management for preserving climax communities, single specialized species and high biodiversity are suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 201
页数:11
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Andren H., Angelstam P., Elevated predation rates as an edge effect in habitat islands: experimental evidence, Ecology, 69, pp. 544-547, (1988)
[2]  
Angelstam P., Predation on ground-nesting bird's nests in relation to predator densities and habitat edge, Oikos, 47, pp. 365-373, (1986)
[3]  
Angelstam P., Conservation of communities - the importance of edges and surroundings in man-dominated landscapes, Ecological Principles of Nature Conservation, (1991)
[4]  
Balser D., Bielak A., De Boer G., Tobias T., Adindu G., Dorney R.S., Nature reserve designation in a cultural landscape, incorporating island biogeography theory, Landscape Plann, 8, pp. 329-347, (1981)
[5]  
Baudry J., Merriam G., Connectivity and connectedness: functional versus structural patterns in landscapes, Connectivity in Landscape Ecology, pp. 23-28, (1988)
[6]  
Boecklen W.J., Bell G.W., Consequences of faunal collapse and genetic drift to the design of nature reserves, Nature Conservation - the Role of Remnants of Native Vegetation, pp. 141-149, (1987)
[7]  
Burkey T.V., Extinction in nature reserves: the effect of fragmentation and the importance of migration between reserve fragments, Oikos, 55, pp. 75-81, (1989)
[8]  
Ericson L., Hansson L., Larsson T., Rasmusson G., The importance of residual biotopes for fauna and flora, Connectivity in Landscape Ecology, pp. 105-106, (1988)
[9]  
Esseen P.-A., Ecology of lichens in boreal coniferous forests with reference to spatial and temporal patterns, (1983)
[10]  
Esseen P.A., Ehnstrom B., Ericson L., Sjoberg K., Boreal forests -the focal habitats of Fennoscandia, Ecological Principles of Nature Conservation, (1991)