DEMAND FOR CLEAN-FUEL VEHICLES IN CALIFORNIA - A DISCRETE-CHOICE STATED PREFERENCE PILOT PROJECT

被引:245
作者
BUNCH, DS
BRADLEY, M
GOLOB, TF
KITAMURA, R
OCCHIUZZO, GP
机构
[1] HAGUE CONSULTING GRP,2585 GJ THE HAGUE,NETHERLANDS
[2] UNIV CALIF DAVIS,DEPT CIVIL ENGN,DAVIS,CA 95616
[3] CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISS,DEMAND FORECASTING OFF,1516 9TH ST,SACRAMENTO,CA 95814
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0965-8564(93)90062-P
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A study was conducted to determine how demand for clean-fuel vehicles and their fuels is likely to vary as a function of attributes that distinguish these vehicles from conventional gasoline vehicles. For the purposes of the study, clean-fuel vehicles are defined to encompass both electric vehicles and unspecified (methanol, ethanol, compressed natural gas or propane) liquid and gaseous fuel vehicles, in both dedicated or multiple-fuel versions. The attributes include vehicle purchase price, fuel operating cost, vehicle range between refueling, availability of fuel, dedicated versus multiple-fuel capability and the level of reduction in emissions (compared to current vehicles). In a mail-back stated preference survey, approximately 700 respondents in the California South Coast Air Basin gave their choices among sets of hypothetical future vehicles, as well as their choices between alternative fuel versus gasoline for hypothetical multiple-fuel vehicles. Estimates of attribute importance and segment differences are made using discrete-choice nested multinomial logit models for vehicle choice and binomial logit models for fuel choice. These estimates can be used to modify present vehicle-type choice and utilization models to accommodate clean-fuel vehicles; they can also be used to evaluate scenarios for alternative clean-fuel vehicle and fuel supply configurations. Results indicate that range between refueling is an important attribute, particularly if range for an alternative fuel is substantially less than that for gasoline. For fuel choice, the most important attributes are range and fuel cost, but the predicted probability of choosing alternative fuel is also affected by emissions levels, which can compensate for differences in fuel prices.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 253
页数:17
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
*AIR RES BEARD, 1991, LOW EM VEH CLEAN FUE
[2]  
BATES J, 1991, J TRANSP ECON POLICY, V12, P59
[3]  
BEGGS S, 1981, J ECONOMETRICS, V16, P1
[4]  
Ben-Akiva Moshe E., 1985, DISCRETE CHOICE ANAL
[5]  
BUNCH DS, 1991, COMPARISON EXPT DESI
[7]   ESTIMATING TREE LOGIT-MODELS [J].
DALY, A .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 1987, 21 (04) :251-267
[8]   AN ECONOMETRIC-ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL ELECTRIC APPLIANCE HOLDINGS AND CONSUMPTION [J].
DUBIN, JA ;
MCFADDEN, DL .
ECONOMETRICA, 1984, 52 (02) :345-362
[9]  
GOLOB TF, 1991, JAN ANN M TRANSP RES