SIGNAL-TO-NOISE EFFICIENCY IN MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING

被引:85
作者
PARKER, DL [1 ]
GULLBERG, GT [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV UTAH,LATTER DAY ST HOSP,DEPT RADIOL,SALT LAKE CITY,UT 84143
关键词
D O I
10.1118/1.596503
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The dependence of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) on the analog filter, the sampling rate and the number and dimensions of voxels is derived for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). It is shown that the object signal-to-noise ratio scales directly with the voxel volume and the square root of the number of voxels. Defining an efficiency figure of merit as the SNR divided by the square root of the imaging time, it is shown that efficiency is always improved when imaging with the lowest possible resolution (largest voxel dimensions) consistent with viewing the desired anatomical detail. The results directly imply the relative efficiency of 3-D (volume), 2-D (plane), 1-D (line) and 0-D (point) imaging techniques. It is shown that spatial averaging is an inefficient method of noise reduction in MRI. As long as voxel size is maintained constant, one can image as many pixels in the readout direction as desired with no loss in SNR; that is, the number of pixels in the readout direction has no effect on the image SNR. Further, multiple sampling of each phase encoding value (to improve SNR) has no advantage over increasing the number of pixels in the phase encoding direction while leaving the voxel size constant. Some experimental observations are given. © 1990, American Association of Physicists in Medicine. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 257
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
BEYER WH, 1981, CRC STANDARD MATH TA, P339
[2]   CENTRAL NERVOUS-SYSTEM HIGH-RESOLUTION MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING - EFFECT OF INCREASING SPATIAL-RESOLUTION ON RESOLVING POWER [J].
BRADLEY, WG ;
KORTMAN, KE ;
CRUES, JV .
RADIOLOGY, 1985, 156 (01) :93-98
[3]  
BRADLEY WG, 1983, ADV IMAGING TECHNIQU, P15
[4]   SENSITIVITY AND PERFORMANCE TIME IN NMR IMAGING [J].
BRUNNER, P ;
ERNST, RR .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 1979, 33 (01) :83-106
[5]   SENSITIVITY AND RESOLUTION IN NMR IMAGING [J].
CALLAGHAN, PT ;
ECCLES, CD .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 1987, 71 (03) :426-445
[6]   SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO AND SECTION THICKNESS IN TWO-DIMENSIONAL VERSUS 3-DIMENSIONAL FOURIER-TRANSFORM MR IMAGING [J].
CARLSON, J ;
CROOKS, L ;
ORTENDAHL, D ;
KRAMER, DM ;
KAUFMAN, L .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 166 (01) :266-270
[7]  
DENBOEF JH, 1984, PHYS MED BIOL, V29, P857, DOI 10.1088/0031-9155/29/7/008
[8]   SPIN WARP NMR IMAGING AND APPLICATIONS TO HUMAN WHOLE-BODY IMAGING [J].
EDELSTEIN, WA ;
HUTCHISON, JMS ;
JOHNSON, G ;
REDPATH, T .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1980, 25 (04) :751-756
[9]   SIGNAL, NOISE, AND CONTRAST IN NUCLEAR MAGNETIC-RESONANCE (NMR) IMAGING [J].
EDELSTEIN, WA ;
BOTTOMLEY, PA ;
HART, HR ;
SMITH, LS .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1983, 7 (03) :391-401
[10]  
HANSON K M, 1979, Medical Physics (Woodbury), V6, P441, DOI 10.1118/1.594534