OBSERVER VARIABILITY IN THE ASSESSMENT OF DISC DEGENERATION ON MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGES OF THE LUMBAR AND THORACIC SPINE

被引:100
作者
RAININKO, R
MANNINEN, H
BATTIE, MC
GIBBONS, LE
GILL, K
FISHER, LD
机构
[1] KUOPIO UNIV,DEPT RADIOL,KUOPIO,FINLAND
[2] UNIV WASHINGTON,DEPT ORTHOPAED,SEATTLE,WA 98195
[3] UNIV TEXAS,SW MED SCH,DEPT ORTHOPAED,DALLAS,TX 75230
[4] UNIV WASHINGTON,DEPT BIOSTAT,SEATTLE,WA 98195
关键词
DISC DEGENERATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199505000-00009
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility study. Objective. This study investigates the variability in the interpretation of degenerative disc findings using magnetic resonance imaging. Summary of Background Data. Magnetic resonance imaging has been used for years in clinical diagnostics, primarily to investigate disc herniation and spinal stenosis. Less attention has been paid to other disc findings and their assessment reliability. Methods. Three independent readers evaluated magnetic resonance images of the lumbar and the lower and middle thoracic spines of 122 subjects by grading 12 aspects of the intervertebral discs and adjacent endplates using written definitions and example images. Images of 20 subjects were reevaluated for the assessment of intraobserver agreement. Results. Agreement was highest in the lower lumbar and poorest in the middle thoracic spine. Intraobserver agreement was generally fair to excellent for almost all variables in the lumbar and lower thoracic spine (most intraclass correlation and kappa coefficients for these regions were above 0.70). Interobserver agreement was notably lower than intraobserver agreement, except for osteophytes and endplate defects in some regions. Conclusions. Intraobserver agreement in the evaluation of disc degeneration was at an acceptable level, in general, in the lumbar and lower thoracic spine. However, assessments were substantially more variable between readers, which limits comparisons of evaluations between different readers.
引用
收藏
页码:1029 / 1035
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]
Bartko J.J., The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability, Psychol Rep, 19, pp. 3-11, (1966)
[2]
Boden S.D., Davis D.O., Dina T.S., Patronas N.J., Wiesel S.W., Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects, J Bone Joint Surg [Am], 72, pp. 403-408, (1990)
[3]
Cherkin D.C., Maccornack F.A., Berg A.O., Managing low back pain: A comparison of the beliefs and behaviors of family medicine physicians and chiropractors, West J Med 1988, 149, pp. 475-480
[4]
Cohen J., A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, pp. 37-46, (1960)
[5]
Coste J., Paolaggi J.B., Spira A., Reliability of interpretation of plain lumbar spine radiographs in benign, mechanical low- back pain, Spine, 16, pp. 426-428, (1990)
[6]
Deyo R.A., McNiesh L.M., Cone R.O., Observer variability in the interpretation of lumbar spine radiographs, Arthritis Rheum, 28, pp. 1066-1070, (1985)
[7]
Feinstein A.R., Cicchetti D.V., High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes, J Clin Epidemiol, 43, pp. 543-549, (1990)
[8]
Fleiss J.L., The measurement of interrater agreement, Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, pp. 212-236, (1981)
[9]
Hilton R.C., Ball J., Benn R.T., Vertebral end-plate lesions (Schmorl’s nodes) in the dorsolumbar spine, Ann Rheum Dis, 35, pp. 127-132, (1976)
[10]
Horton W.C., Daftari T.K., Which disc as visualized by magnetic resonance imaging is actually a source of pain? A correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and discography, Spine, 17, (1992)