DIAZEPAM VERSUS MIDAZOLAM FOR COLONOSCOPY - A PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF PREDICTED VERSUS ACTUAL DOSING REQUIREMENTS

被引:27
作者
GINSBERG, GG [1 ]
LEWIS, JH [1 ]
GALLAGHER, JE [1 ]
FLEISCHER, DE [1 ]
ALKAWAS, FH [1 ]
NGUYEN, CC [1 ]
MUNDT, DJ [1 ]
BENJAMIN, SB [1 ]
机构
[1] GEORGETOWN UNIV,MED CTR,DIV GASTROENTEROL,3800 RESERVOIR RD NW,WASHINGTON,DC 20007
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0016-5107(92)70559-8
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind study to evaluate the efficacy of the currently recommended low doses of midazolam for conscious sedation compared with diazepam for colonoscopy. Each agent was administered in a fixed ratio dose in combination with meperidine, and titrated incrementally to allow for adequate sedation prior to initiating and during the procedure. The currently recommended starting dose of midazolam (0.03 mg/kg) proved to be very appropriate for pre-medication. In contrast, the currently recommended starting dose of diazepam (0.10 mg/kg) proved excessive in 21% of patients (especially in those aged >65). The low initial and incremental doses of midazolam compared favorably with diazepam in all efficacy parameters studied and exceeded diazepam in post-procedure amnesia scores (p = 0.01). Moreover, the sedative effects of midazolam at these lower doses were not lost despite long duration procedures (>40 min). We conclude that midazolam, given in small incremental doses, in combination with meperidine, produces effective conscious sedation for colonoscopy and exceeds diazepam in its amnestic effect.
引用
收藏
页码:651 / 656
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   RESULTS FROM THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY UNITED-STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION COLLABORATIVE STUDY ON COMPLICATION RATES AND DRUG-USE DURING GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY [J].
ARROWSMITH, JB ;
GERSTMAN, BB ;
FLEISCHER, DE ;
BENJAMIN, SB .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1991, 37 (04) :421-427
[2]   MIDAZOLAM VERSUS DIAZEPAM FOR COMBINED ESOPHAGOGASTRODUODENOSCOPY AND COLONOSCOPY [J].
BROUILLETTE, DE ;
LEVENTHAL, R ;
KUMAR, S ;
BERMAN, D ;
KAJANI, M ;
YOO, YK ;
CARRA, J ;
TARTER, R ;
VANTHIEL, DH .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1989, 34 (08) :1265-1271
[3]  
BUHRER M, 1990, CLIN PHARMACOL THER, V48, P555
[4]   MIDAZOLAM, A NEW MORE POTENT BENZODIAZEPINE, COMPARED WITH DIAZEPAM - A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND-STUDY OF PREENDOSCOPIC SEDATIVES [J].
COLE, SG ;
BROZINSKY, S ;
ISENBERG, JI .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1983, 29 (03) :219-222
[5]   SEQUELAE AFTER INTRAVENOUS-INJECTION OF 3 BENZODIAZEPINES - DIAZEPAM, LORAZEPAM, AND FLUNITRAZEPAM [J].
HEGARTY, JE ;
DUNDEE, JW .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1977, 2 (6099) :1384-1385
[6]  
KEEFFEE EB, 1990, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V36, P513
[7]   SEDATION FOR UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF MIDAZOLAM AND DIAZEPAM [J].
LEE, MG ;
HANNA, W ;
HARDING, H .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1989, 35 (02) :82-84
[8]   DIAZEPAM VERSUS MIDAZOLAM (VERSED) IN OUTPATIENT COLONOSCOPY - A DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED STUDY [J].
LEWIS, BS ;
SHLIEN, RD ;
WAYE, JD ;
KNIGHT, RJ ;
ALDOROTY, RA .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1989, 35 (01) :33-36
[9]   SAFETY OF MIDAZOLAM AND DIAZEPAM FOR CONSCIOUS SEDATION [J].
LEWIS, JH ;
BENJAMIN, SB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1990, 12 (06) :716-717
[10]  
MARSHALL BE, 1990, PHARM BASIS THERAPEU