A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research

被引:18277
作者
Koo, Terry K. [1 ]
Li, Mae Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] New York Chiropract Coll, Foot Levelers Biomech Res Lab, Seneca Falls, NY USA
关键词
Reliability and validity; Research; Statistics;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) is a widely used reliability index in testretest, intrarater, and interrater reliability analyses. This article introduces the basic concept of ICC in the content of reliability analysis. Discussion for Researchers: There are 10 forms of ICCs. Because each form involves distinct assumptions in their calculation and will lead to different interpretations, researchers should explicitly specify the ICC form they used in their calculation. A thorough review of the research design is needed in selecting the appropriate form of ICC to evaluate reliability. The best practice of reporting ICC should include software information, "model," "type," and "definition" selections. Discussion for Readers: When coming across an article that includes ICC, readers should first check whether information about the ICC form has been reported and if an appropriate ICC form was used. Based on the 95% confident interval of the ICC estimate, values less than 0.5, between 0.5 and 0.75, between 0.75 and 0.9, and greater than 0.90 are indicative of poor, moderate, good, and excellent reliability, respectively. Conclusion: This article provides a practical guideline for clinical researchers to choose the correct form of ICC and suggests the best practice of reporting ICC parameters in scientific publications. This article also gives readers an appreciation forwhat to look for when coming across ICCwhile reading an article. (C) 2016 National University of Health Sciences.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 163
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   INTRACLASS CORRELATION COEFFICIENT AS A MEASURE OF RELIABILITY [J].
BARTKO, JJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1966, 19 (01) :3-&
[2]   RELIABILITY OF THE GOUTALLIER CLASSIFICATION IN QUANTIFYING MUSCLE FATTY DEGENERATION IN THE LUMBAR MULTIFIDUS USING MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING [J].
Battaglia, Patrick J. ;
Maeda, Yumi ;
Welk, Aaron ;
Hough, Brad ;
Kettner, Norman .
JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2014, 37 (03) :190-197
[3]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[4]  
BROWN BW, 1962, J CLIN PSYCHOL, V18, P95, DOI 10.1002/1097-4679(196201)18:1<95::AID-JCLP2270180131>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-2
[6]  
Bruton A., 2000, PHYSIOTHERAPY, V86, P94, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)61211-4
[7]   Reliability of detection of lumbar lateral shift [J].
Clare, HA ;
Adams, R ;
Maher, CG .
JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2003, 26 (08) :476-480
[8]   RELIABILITY OF ZYGAPOPHYSIAL JOINT SPACE MEASUREMENTS MADE FROM MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING SCANS OF ACUTE LOW BACK PAIN SUBJECTS: COMPARISON OF 2 STATISTICAL METHODS [J].
Cramer, Gregory D. ;
Cantu, Joe A. ;
Pocius, Judith D. ;
Cambron, Jerrilyn A. ;
McKinnis, Ray A. .
JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2010, 33 (03) :220-225
[9]  
Daly LE, 2000, INTERPRETATION USE M
[10]  
Ebel RL., 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P407