PUNISHMENT - INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF DELAY AND INTENSITY OF SHOCK

被引:20
作者
COHEN, PS
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1901/jeab.1968.11-789
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A discrete‐trial punishment procedure, with rats, was used to examine how delay‐of‐shock intervals of 0 to 28 sec and shock intensity interact to decrease the frequency and increase the latency of a positively reinforced response. For delay‐of‐shock intervals of 0, 7, 14, and 28 sec, there was a range of shock intensities, for some subjects, over which the punishing effect of shock was an increasing, monotonic function of shock intensity. For other subjects this transition was abrupt. Functions relating response frequency and latency measures to shock intensity were displaced toward higher values on the shock intensity axis with an increase in delay‐of‐shock interval. The effects of “gradual” and “abrupt” introduction to “severe” shock, as well as re‐exposure to previously used shock intensities, were examined under both the immediate and delay‐of‐shock conditions. With delay‐of‐shock intervals of 7, 14, or 28 sec, shock intensities of approximately 0.50 milliamperes or greater were necessary to decrease substantially the number and increase the latency of the lever‐pressing response. For the immediate punishment group this intensity was approximately 0.20 ma. These facts were related to Annau and Kamin's (1961) conditioned emotional response experiment in which a shock intensity of 0.49 ma or greater was required to suppress the rate of a positively reinforced response. 1968 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
引用
收藏
页码:789 / +
页数:1
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   CONDITIONED EMOTIONAL RESPONSE AS A FUNCTION OF INTENSITY OF US [J].
ANNAU, Z ;
KAMIN, LJ .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1961, 54 (04) :428-&
[2]   PUNISHMENT AND SHOCK INTENSITY [J].
APPEL, JB .
SCIENCE, 1963, 141 (358) :528-&
[4]   TEMPORAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RESPONSE AND PUNISHMENT [J].
CAMP, DS ;
RAYMOND, GA ;
CHURCH, RM .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1967, 74 (01) :114-&
[5]   PUNISHMENT .1. THE AVOIDANCE HYPOTHESIS [J].
DINSMOOR, JA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1954, 61 (01) :34-46
[6]  
DINSMOOR JA, 1958, J EXP ANAL BEHAV, V1, P264
[7]   A DISCRIMINATION BASED ON PUNISHMENT [J].
Dinsmoor, James A. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1952, 4 :27-45
[8]   Some quantitative properties of anxiety [J].
Estes, WK ;
Skinner, BF .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1941, 29 (05) :390-400
[10]   EFFECTS OF PUNISHMENT INTENSITY ON SQUIRREL MONKEYS [J].
HAKE, DF ;
AZRIN, NH ;
OXFORD, R .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1967, 10 (01) :95-&