A METHOD TO EMPLOY THE AERODYNAMIC PARTICLE SIZER FACTORY CALIBRATION UNDER DIFFERENT OPERATING-CONDITIONS

被引:19
作者
RADER, DJ
BROCKMANN, JE
CEMAN, DL
LUCERO, DA
机构
[1] Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM
基金
美国能源部;
关键词
Aerodynamics - Instruments--Calibration - Particle Size Analysis;
D O I
10.1080/02786829008959466
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The dimensionless aerodynamic particle sizer (APS) response function (normalized particle velocity against particle Stokes number) first reported by Chen et al. (1985) is explored for much larger solid particles (diameters to 35 μm) over a similar range of instrument pressures (624–l740 mm Hg) and flow rates (4.2–6.0 L/min). An essentially unique response function is found for low and intermediate Stokes numbers under a variety of operating conditions, including the use of argon as the carrier gas. For large particles, however, non-Stokesian drag effects introduce systematic differences among calibration sets so that a unique response function no longer applies. The largest differences are observed between calibrations performed in air and argon, although even in this case the sizing error amounts to < 12% for a 20-μm polystyrene latex sphere. For intermediate Stokes numbers, a direct consequence of this work is that a reference calibration (channel number against Stokes number) can be used under different ambient conditions by setting the APS to operate at the same nozzle velocity as used in the reference calibration. With the single-velocity method, the factory-supplied calibration relating channel number to aerodynamic diameter can be used for air over a reasonable range of ambient temperatures and pressures. The same calibration can be used with an argon carrier gas provided that the aerodynamic diameters reported by the APS software are adjusted by the square root of the gas viscosity ratio. For the single-velocity mode of operation, a generalization of a correction proposed by Wang and John (1987, 1989) can be made and is shown to reduce by one half the sizing error introduced by non-Stokesian drag. © 1990 Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:514 / 521
页数:8
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   THEORETICAL-ANALYSIS OF THE PERFORMANCE OF THE TSI AERODYNAMIC PARTICLE SIZER - THE EFFECT OF DENSITY ON RESPONSE [J].
ANANTH, G ;
WILSON, JC .
AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1988, 9 (03) :189-199
[2]   CALIBRATION AND USE OF THE AERODYNAMIC PARTICLE SIZER (APS 3300) [J].
BARON, PA .
AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1986, 5 (01) :55-67
[3]  
BLACKFORD DB, 1988, COMMUNICATION
[4]   CALIBRATION OF THE AERODYNAMIC PARTICLE SIZER 3310 (APS-3310) WITH POLYSTYRENE LATEX MONODISPERSE SPHERES AND OLEIC-ACID MONODISPERSE PARTICLES [J].
BROCKMANN, JE ;
YAMANO, N ;
LUCERO, D .
AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1988, 8 (03) :279-281
[5]   APS RESPONSE TO NONSPHERICAL PARTICLES AND EXPERIMENTAL-DETERMINATION OF DYNAMIC SHAPE FACTOR [J].
BROCKMANN, JE ;
RADER, DJ .
AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1990, 13 (02) :162-172
[6]   PERFORMANCE OF A TSI AERODYNAMIC PARTICLE SIZER [J].
CHEN, BT ;
CHENG, YS ;
YEH, HC .
AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1985, 4 (01) :89-97
[7]  
Griffiths W. D., 1986, TSI JPARTICLE INSTRU, V1, P3
[8]  
Remiarz RJ, 1983, AEROSOLS MINING IND, P879
[9]   A SIMPLE ITERATION PROCEDURE TO CORRECT FOR THE DENSITY EFFECT IN THE AERODYNAMIC PARTICLE SIZER [J].
WANG, HC ;
JOHN, W .
AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1989, 10 (03) :501-505
[10]   PARTICLE DENSITY CORRECTION FOR THE AERODYNAMIC PARTICLE SIZER [J].
WANG, HC ;
JOHN, W .
AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1987, 6 (02) :191-198