NEW GRADING AND SCORING FOR ANAL INCONTINENCE - EVALUATION OF 335 PATIENTS

被引:230
作者
PESCATORI, M
ANASTASIO, G
BOTTINI, C
MENTASTI, A
机构
[1] Instituto di Clinica Chirurgica, Universita' Cattolica, Rome
关键词
ANAL INCONTINENCE; GRADING; SCORE;
D O I
10.1007/BF02049407
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
A grading system of anal incontinence (AI) is described that takes into account both degree and frequency of symptoms. A, B, and C indicate AI for flatus/mucus, liquid stool, and solid stool, respectively; 1, 2, and 3 indicate occasional, weekly, and daily AI. A scoring system, ranging from 0 (continence) to 6 (severe AI, i. e., daily AI for solid stool or C3) also is reported. Three hundred thirty-five patients have been evaluated by this method in our institution: 30 percent had severe AI, graded as C3; only 9 percent had mild symptoms graded as A. Both males and females could not control diarrhea (Grade B) in 44 percent of cases. Nearly half of the 110 patients who underwent surgery had a C3 incontinence before treatment. Positive results were achieved in 75 percent of cases after surgery: e.g., AI score significantly improved from 4.2 +/- 1.6 to 1.5 +/- 1.9 (P < 0.001) in those with AI and rectal prolapse. Most of the failures were the patients with idiopathic C3 incontinence. In conclusion, this grading and scoring system allowed a satisfactory assessment of patients' AI before and after treatment. It may also be used to achieve an objective comparison between different series.
引用
收藏
页码:482 / 487
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   RECOVERY OF THE INTERNAL ANAL-SPHINCTER FOLLOWING RECTOPEXY - A POSSIBLE EXPLANATION FOR CONTINENCE IMPROVEMENT [J].
BRODEN, G ;
DOLK, A ;
HOLMSTROM, B .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 1988, 3 (01) :23-28
[2]   GRACILIS MUSCLE TRANSPOSITION FOR ANAL INCONTINENCE - LATE RESULTS [J].
CORMAN, ML .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1985, 72 :S21-S22
[3]   CLINICAL AND MANOMETRIC EVALUATION OF ANAL-SPHINCTER FUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITH RECTAL PROLAPSE [J].
HILTUNEN, KM ;
MATIKAINEN, M ;
AUVINEN, O ;
HIETANEN, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1986, 151 (04) :489-492
[4]  
HOLSCHNEIDER AM, 1983, ACTA CHIR BELG, V83, P191
[5]   MANAGEMENT OF FECAL INCONTINENCE AND RESULTS OF SURGICAL-TREATMENT [J].
KEIGHLEY, MRB ;
FIELDING, JWL .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1983, 70 (08) :463-468
[6]   CINE RADIOGRAPHY IN ANORECTAL MALFORMATIONS [J].
KELLY, JH .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 1969, 4 (05) :538-&
[7]   CLINICAL APPLICATION OF ANORECTAL PHYSIOLOGY [J].
LANE, RH .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE-LONDON, 1975, 68 (01) :28-30
[8]   PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF CONSERVATIVE AND OPERATIVE TREATMENT FOR FECAL INCONTINENCE [J].
MILLER, R ;
BARTOLO, DCC ;
LOCKEEDMUNDS, JC ;
MORTENSEN, NJM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1988, 75 (02) :101-105
[9]  
PARKS AG, 1975, P ROY SOC MED, V68, P681
[10]   FACTORS AFFECTING ANAL CONTINENCE AFTER RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY [J].
PESCATORI, M ;
MATTANA, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 1990, 5 (04) :213-218