SENSITIVITY AND UNCERTAINTY OF PROCESS DESIGNS TO THERMODYNAMIC MODEL PARAMETERS - A MONTE-CARLO APPROACH

被引:26
作者
REED, ME [1 ]
WHITING, WB [1 ]
机构
[1] W VIRGINIA UNIV,DEPT CHEM ENGN,MORGANTOWN,WV 26506
关键词
SENSITIVITY; UNCERTAINTY; THERMODYNAMIC MODELS; PROCESS DESIGN; MONTE-CARLO;
D O I
10.1080/00986449308936176
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Process simultation relies heavily on the calculation of physical properties through thermodynamic models. The parameters in these models are subject to uncertainties that may, at first, appear to be small. However, the designs developed through use of these models can be significantly sensitive to these parameter uncertainties. Previous studies have considered special cases of design error or have involved simple sensitivity analyses close to the optimum design case. In the present work, we use Monte Carlo simulation with Latin Hypercube Sampling to quantify the probability of design errors. An example of binary distillation with phase-equilibrium calculations from a cubic equation of state is used to illustrate the technique.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 48
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   STOCHASTIC MODELING OF CHEMICAL PROCESSES [J].
DIWEKAR, UM ;
RUBIN, ES .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1991, 15 (02) :105-114
[2]  
ELLIOT DG, 1977, ACS SYM SER, V60, P239
[3]  
FREY HC, 1991, DOEMC242483015 NAT T
[4]  
HSU SI, 1987, HYDROCARB PROCESS, V66, P43
[5]  
IMAN RL, 1985, NUREGCR4122 NAT TECH
[6]  
KLOTZ HC, 1983, HYDROCARB PROCESS, V62, P84
[7]   DATA QUALITY FOR PROCESS DESIGN [J].
LARSEN, AH .
FLUID PHASE EQUILIBRIA, 1986, 29 :47-58
[8]   EXACT DETERMINATION OF PROCESS SENSITIVITY TO PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES [J].
MACCHIETTO, S ;
MADUABEUKE, G ;
SZCZEPANSKI, R .
FLUID PHASE EQUILIBRIA, 1986, 29 :59-67
[9]   EFFECTS OF THERMOPHYSICAL PROPERTY ESTIMATION ON PROCESS DESIGN [J].
MAH, RSH .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1977, 1 (03) :183-189
[10]   A COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS FOR SELECTING VALUES OF INPUT VARIABLES IN THE ANALYSIS OF OUTPUT FROM A COMPUTER CODE [J].
MCKAY, MD ;
BECKMAN, RJ ;
CONOVER, WJ .
TECHNOMETRICS, 1979, 21 (02) :239-245