EFFECTS OF SUBSTRATE RELIEF ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF PERIPHYTON IN LABORATORY STREAMS .1. HYDROLOGY

被引:33
作者
DENICOLA, DM [1 ]
MCINTIRE, CD [1 ]
机构
[1] OREGON STATE UNIV,DEPT BOT & PLANT PATHOL,CORVALLIS,OR 97331
关键词
COLONIZATION; CURRENT; HYDROLOGY; PATCH DYNAMICS; PERIPHYTON; ROUGHNESS; STREAMS; SUCCESSION;
D O I
10.1111/j.0022-3646.1990.00624.x
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
We examined the hypothesis that the heterogeneity of epilithic algal assemblages in streams may be partly a result of hydrologic differences created when water flows over a rough substrate. A 32-day experiment was conducted in laboratory streams that contained either 22.5 x 22.5 x 4 cm or 7.5 x 22.5 x 4 cm tile blocks. Free-water velocities in the streams averaged 28 cm.s-1. Hydrologic parameters and algal assemblages associated with surfaces on top of blocks and with recessed surfaces between blocks were compared to corresponding surfaces in streams with no relief. In streams with blocks, shear velocities averaged 1.7 cm.s-1 on the top of blocks and 0.8 cm.s-1 in the recessed areas. Shear velocity at corresponding surfaces in the control (no relief) streams averaged 1.9 cm.s-1 and exhibited little variation. The hydrologic differences created by the larger blocks significantly affected the distribution of algal biomass, with recessed areas having an average of 2.6 g.m-2 AFDW more biomass than surfaces on the top of blocks. Differences in shear velocities and biomass accumulation between top and recessed areas for the smaller blocks were less than for large blocks. Successional changes on all substrates were similar with the exception that recessed surfaces had a significantly greater abundance of the filamentous chlorophyte Stigeoclonium tenue (Ag.) Kutz. after day 16. The results suggest that in cobble riffle areas of natural streams, the interaction between current flow and substrate relief has the potential to create patches of algae which are different in biomass and taxonomic composition.
引用
收藏
页码:624 / 633
页数:10
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1958, INT VER THEOR ANGEW, DOI [10.1080/05384680.1958.11904091, DOI 10.1080/05384680.1958.11904091]
[2]  
ANTOINE SE, 1982, INT REV GES HYDROBIO, V67, P575
[3]  
BACKAUS D, 1967, ARCH HYDROBIOL S, V30, P362
[4]   COLONIZATION RATES AND COMMUNITY STRUCTURE OF DIATOMS ON 3 DIFFERENT ROCK SUBSTRATA IN A LOTIC SYSTEM [J].
BLINN, DW ;
FREDERICKSEN, A ;
KORTE, V .
BRITISH PHYCOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 1980, 15 (04) :303-310
[5]  
Blum J. L., 1960, SPEC PUBLS PYMATUNIN, V2, P11
[6]  
BUSCH D E, 1979, Journal of the Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science, V14, P43
[7]  
Chow V.T., 1959, OPEN CHANNEL HYDRAUL
[8]  
Cochran W.G, 1957, STAT METHODS, V6th ed
[9]   AN ECOLOGICALLY USEFUL CLASSIFICATION OF MEAN AND NEAR-BED FLOWS IN STREAMS AND RIVERS [J].
DAVIS, JA ;
BARMUTA, LA .
FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 1989, 21 (02) :271-282
[10]  
DEANGELIS DL, 1987, ECOL MONOGR, V5, P1