INSTRUCTIONAL VARIATIONS AND ADULTS CONCEPTUAL TEMPO PERFORMANCE

被引:1
作者
GILPIN, AR
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, IA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00221309.1979.9710525
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Forty-six college students were given the adult form of Kagan's Matching Familiar Figures Test twice, once under the standard (neutral) instructions, and a second time during which Ss were randomly assigned to one of three instruction groups. Two groups received instructions to minimize either response time or errors; a third group received neutral instructions. During the second administration, the group instructed to minimize response time showed more errors and lower response latency than the group instructed to minimize errors. Variances during the two administrations were compared within each group, with the use of the F-max test. Variances in the neutral group did not differ, but those in the other groups did, with variances significantly smaller during the second administration of the task. These results suggest that conceptual tempo reflects differences in implicit information processing criteria, which can be changed voluntarily, rather than automatic dispositional personality differences. © 1979 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 61
页数:9
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   SOME MISGIVINGS ABOUT MATCHING FAMILIAR FIGURES TEST AS A MEASURE OF REFLECTION-IMPULSIVITY [J].
BLOCK, J ;
BLOCK, JH ;
HARRINGT.DM .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1974, 10 (05) :611-632
[2]   MATCHING FAMILIAR FIGURES TEST - LOOK AT ITS PSYCHOMETRIC CREDIBILITY [J].
EGELAND, B ;
WEINBERG, RA .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1976, 47 (02) :483-491
[3]   CONFOUNDING EXPERIMENTER EFFECTS IN CONCEPTUAL TEMPO RESEARCH - METHODOLOGICAL NOTE [J].
GILPIN, AR .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1975, 37 (03) :1066-1066
[4]   LIMITS OF KAGANS IMPULSIVE REFLECTIVE DISTINCTION [J].
JONES, B ;
MCINTYRE, L .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1976, 4 (03) :272-276
[5]   MODIFIABILITY OF AN IMPULSIVE TEMPO [J].
KAGAN, J ;
PEARSON, L ;
WELCH, L .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1966, 57 (06) :359-&
[6]  
KAGAN J, 1964, PSYCHOL MONOG, V78
[7]   DIFFERENTIAL FEATURE ANALYSIS IN RECOGNITION MEMORY OF REFLECTIVE AND IMPULSIVE CHILDREN [J].
KILBURG, RR ;
SIEGEL, AW .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1973, 1 (04) :413-419
[8]   REFLECTION-IMPULSIVITY - REVIEW [J].
MESSER, SB .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1976, 83 (06) :1026-1052
[9]   VISUAL RECOGNITION MEMORY IN REFLECTIVE AND IMPULSIVE CHILDREN [J].
SIEGEL, AW ;
BABICH, JM ;
KIRASIC, KC .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1974, 2 (02) :379-384
[10]  
STEVENSON HW, 1972, CHILDRENS LEARNING