BEAT-TO-BEAT VARIABILITY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENTS OF LEFT-VENTRICULAR END DIASTOLIC DIAMETER AND PERFORMANCE

被引:30
作者
BELENKIE, I
机构
[1] Division of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta
关键词
Echocardiography; Left ventricular contractility; Left ventricular dimensions; Left ventricular function;
D O I
10.1002/jcu.1870070405
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular dimensions and performance correlate well with similar data from other sources. However, little attention has been paid to the beat‐to‐beat variations in these parameters in individual subjects. Considerable variability in measurements of left ventricular end diastolic diameter (EDD), R‐R interval, mean circumferential fiber shortening velocity (Vcf), and ejection fraction (EF) has been demonstrated in subjects in both sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation. The coefficients of variation have varied from 2.5 to 9 percent, 2.1 to 11.2 percent, 4.4 to 11.0 percent, and 3.4 to 7.8 percent, respectively, in different individuals in sinus rhythm and from 2.0 to 7.9 percent, 2.1 to 20.7 percent, 4.9 to 30.0 percent, and 1.9 to 90.0 percent, respectively, in different patients in atrial fibrillation. Recent ultrasound studies of the interrelationships among preload, afterload, cycle length, and indices of left ventricular performance have yielded variable results. In this study the relationships between both EDD and R‐R interval and echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular function were analyzed in individual subjects in both sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation. Changes in EDD and, to a lesser extent, cycle length were shown to be accompanied by predictable changes in indices of left ventricular function. EDD correlated better than did R‐R interval with Vcf and EF in 8 of 10 and 10 of 10 normal subjects, respectively, and in 9 of 11 and 7 of 11 patients in atrial fibrillation, respectively. The data suggest that preload has a more important effect than cycle length on left ventricular performance. Copyright © 1979 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 268
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Belenkie I, Nutter DO, Clark DW, Et al., Assessment of left ventricular dimensions and function by echocardiography, Am J Cardiol, 31, (1973)
[2]  
Quinones MA, Gaash WH, Alexander JK, Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular function with special reference to normalized velocities, Circulation, 50, (1974)
[3]  
Karliner JS, O'Rourke RA, Usefulness and limitations of assessment of internal shortening velocity by ultra‐sound in man, Chest, 68, (1975)
[4]  
Ludbrook P, Karliner JS, Peterson K, Et al., Comparison of ultrasound and cineangiographic measurements of left ventricular performance in patients with and without wall motion abnormalities, Heart, 35, (1973)
[5]  
Fortuin NJ, Wood WP, Craig E, Evaluation of left ventricular function by echocardiography, Circulation, 46, (1972)
[6]  
McDonald IG, Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular function in aortic valve disease, Circulation, 53, (1976)
[7]  
McDonald IG, Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular function in mitral valve disease, Circulation, 53, (1976)
[8]  
Pombo JF, Troy BL, Russell RO, Left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by echocardiography, Circulation, 43, (1971)
[9]  
Cooper RH, O'Rourke RA, Karliner JS, Et al., Comparison of ultrasound and cineangiographic measurements of the mean rate of circumferential fibre shortening in man, Circulation, 46, (1972)
[10]  
Popp RL, Harrison DC, Ultrasonic cardiac echography for determining stroke volume and valvular regurgitation, Circulation, 41, (1970)