RAPID ESTIMATION OF LEFT-VENTRICULAR CONTRACTILITY FROM END-SYSTOLIC RELATIONS BY ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC AUTOMATED BORDER DETECTION AND FEMORAL ARTERIAL-PRESSURE

被引:46
作者
GORCSAN, J
DENAULT, A
GASIOR, TA
MANDARINO, WA
KANCEL, MJ
DENEAULT, LG
HATTLER, BG
PINSKY, MR
机构
[1] UNIV PITTSBURGH, MED CTR, DIV CARDIOTHORAC SURG, PITTSBURGH, PA 15261 USA
[2] UNIV PITTSBURGH, MED CTR, DIV ANESTHESIA, PITTSBURGH, PA 15261 USA
[3] UNIV PITTSBURGH, MED CTR, DIV CRIT CARE MED, PITTSBURGH, PA 15261 USA
关键词
HEART; END-SYSTOLIC ELASTANCE; LEFT VENTRICULAR PERFORMANCE; PRESSURE-VOLUME RELATION; MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1097/00000542-199409000-00006
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Automated echocardiographic measures of left ventricular (LV) cavity area are closely correlated with changes in volume and can be coupled with LV pressure to construct pressure-area loops in real time. The objective was to rapidly estimate LV contractility from the end-systolic relations of cavity area (as a surrogate for LV volume) and femoral arterial pressure (as a surrogate for LV pressure) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods: Studies were attempted on 18 consecutive patients with recordings of LV pressure, LV area, and femoral arterial pressure on a computer workstation interfaced with the ultrasound system. End-systolic pressure-area relations (in terms of pressure-area elastance [E'(es)]) from pressure-area loops during inferior vena caval occlusions were determined before and immediately after cardiopulmonary bypass using both LV and arterial pressure by semiautomated and automated iterative linear regression methods. Results: Data sets were available for 13 patients before and 8 patients after bypass (21 studies in 14 patients). E'(es) by arterial pressure was closely correlated with E'(es) by LV pressure: r = 0.96, standard error of the estimate = 2 mmHg/cm(2), y = 1.01 X -0.7 by the semiautomated method and r = 0.94, standard error of the estimate = 3 mmHg/cm(2), y = 1.02 X -0.5 by the automated method. Analysis of semiautomated and automated estimates of E'(es) from arterial pressure and E'(es) using LV pressure by the Bland-Altman method showed no systematic measurement bias and calculated limits of agreement of 8 and 9 mmHg/cm(2), respectively. Similar decreases in E'(es) by arterial and LV pressure occurred from before to after bypass in 7 patients with paired data sets: 32 +/- 12 to 15 +/- 6 mmHg/cm(2) and 32 +/- 15 to 15 +/- 7 mmHg/cm(2), respectively (P < 0.05 for both). Conclusions: On-line femoral arterial pressure and LV area data by echocardiographic automated border detection may be used to rapidly calculate E'(es) as a means to estimate LV contractility in selected patients.
引用
收藏
页码:553 / 562
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条