LOW-ANXIOUS, HIGH-ANXIOUS, AND REPRESSIVE COPING STYLES - PSYCHOMETRIC PATTERNS AND BEHAVIORAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL-RESPONSES TO STRESS

被引:848
作者
WEINBERGER, DA [1 ]
SCHWARTZ, GE [1 ]
DAVIDSON, RJ [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY COLL PURCHASE, PURCHASE, NY 10577 USA
关键词
anxiety level & repression; behavioral & physiological responses to stress; male college students;
D O I
10.1037/0021-843X.88.4.369
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
A long-standing problem in stress research has been that individuals' reports of their tendencies to become anxious are often inconsistent with relevant behavioral and physiological indices. This study investigated the distinction between (a) truly low-anxious Ss, who report low trait anxiety on the Taylor Manifest Anxiety Scale and low defensiveness on the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale, and (b) repressors, who report low anxiety but high defensiveness. These groups were compared with a moderately high-anxious one. Heart rate, spontaneous skin resistance responses, and forehead muscle tension were recorded from 40 male college students during a phrase association task. Significant differences in the 3 physiological measures as well as in 3 behavioral ones (reaction time, content avoidance, and verbal interference) all indicated that the repressors were more stressed than the low-anxious Ss despite their claims of lower trait anxiety. The high-anxious group exhibited a 3rd pattern suggesting an intermediate level of anxious responding. These data document the need to distinguish between repressors and truly low-anxious persons in research concerned with relations between self-reported anxiety and behavioral and physiological responses to stress. (42 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved). © 1979 American Psychological Association.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 380
页数:12
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Beck AT, 1979, COGNITIVE THERAPY DE
[2]   THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SHORT FORM OF THE MANIFEST ANXIETY SCALE [J].
BENDIG, AW .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING PSYCHOLOGY, 1956, 20 (05) :384-384
[3]   EMOTIONALITY, REPRESSION-SENSITIZATION, AND MALADJUSTMENT [J].
BLACKBURN, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1965, 111 (473) :399-404
[4]   DIGIT SYMBOL PERFORMANCE OF SUBJECTS VARYING IN ANXIETY AND DEFENSIVENESS [J].
BOOR, M ;
SCHILL, T .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING PSYCHOLOGY, 1967, 31 (06) :600-603
[5]  
BROWN WP, 1961, BRIT J PSYCHOLOG S35, P1
[6]   RELATION OF THE REVISED REPRESSION-SENSITIZATION SCALE TO MEASURES OF SELF-DESCRIPTION [J].
BYRNE, D ;
BARRY, J ;
NELSON, D .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1963, 13 (02) :323-334
[8]  
CHABOT JA, 1973, PSYCHOL BULL, V80, P122
[9]   SELF-PERCEPTION, PERCEPTUAL DEFENSE, AND ADJUSTMENT [J].
CHODORKOFF, B .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1954, 49 (04) :508-512
[10]   NEUROTICISM AND DISCOVERY OF HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE [J].
COCHRANE, R .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 1969, 13 (01) :21-&