THE RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN ACROSS THE POND

被引：36

作者：

Ambrose, Meg Leta ^{[1
,2
,3
]}

Ausloos, Jef ^{[4
,5
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Colorado, ATLAS Inst, Boulder, CO 80309 USA

[2] CableLabs, Louisville, CO USA

[3] Harvard Berkman Ctr Internet & Soc, Cambridge, MA USA

[4] Univ Leuven, Interdisciplinary Ctr Law, Leuven, Belgium

[5] Univ Leuven, ICT ICRI, Leuven, Belgium

来源：

JOURNAL OF INFORMATION POLICY | 2013年 / 3卷

关键词：

D O I：

10.5325/jinfopoli.3.2013.0001

中图分类号：

G2 [信息与知识传播];

学科分类号：

05 ; 0503 ;

摘要：

Are you unclear about the European Commission's 2012 draft Data Protection Regulation proposing a qualified "right to be forgotten?" That's not surprising, say Meg Ambrose and Jef Ausloos. Their in-depth analysis finds a bifurcated social and legal history, divergent conceptions of the "right," and alternative options for implementation. They contrast a right to "oblivion" (full deletion of certain public data) with a "right to erasure" (removal of personal data provided for automated processing) and find them conflated in the "right to be forgotten" in the EU's proposed data regulation. The two should be separated, they argue, with support for the right to erasure while more study is needed on the less clear "right to oblivion."

引用

页码：1 / 23

页数：23