PEER-REVIEW AT THE DEUTSCHE-FORSCHUNGSGEMEINSCHAFT

被引：27

作者：

HARTMANN, I ^{[1
]}

NEIDHARDT, F ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] WISSENSCH ZENTRUM BERLIN SOZIALFORSCH,W-1000 BERLIN 30,GERMANY

来源：

SCIENTOMETRICS | 1990年 / 19卷 / 5-6期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1007/BF02020704

中图分类号：

TP39 [计算机的应用];

学科分类号：

081203 ; 0835 ;

摘要：

Results of a study designed to investigate the peer review system at the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft are presented. 242 applications for grants and 639 corresponding reviews were analysed to explore criteria actually used by peers in assessing the quality of proposals. The findings show a wide range of criteria used, an uneven distribution of positive and negative evaluation along these criteria, high inter-referee agreement and different degrees of impact of the evaluations on the overall recommendation. © 1990 Akadémiai Kiadó.

引用

页码：419 / 425

页数：7

共 12 条

[1]

[Anonymous], SOCIAL THEORY SOCIAL

[2]

[Anonymous], 1966, SOCIAL SYSTEM SCI

[3] RELIABILITY OF REVIEWS FOR THE AMERICAN-PSYCHOLOGIST - A BIOSTATISTICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE DATA [J].

CICCHETTI, DV .

AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1980, 35 (03) :300-303

[4] CHANCE AND CONSENSUS IN PEER-REVIEW [J].

COLE, S ;

COLE, JR ;

SIMON, GA .

SCIENCE, 1981, 214 (4523) :881-886

[5]

COLE S, 1978, PEER REV NATIONAL SC

[6]

COLE S, 1981, SCI, V214, P884

[7]

HARTMANN I, 1990, BEGUTACHTUNG FORSCHU

[8]

LISCH R, 1978, GRUNDLAGEN MODELLE I

[9]

MEIER HOFER L, 1983, PROJEKTSELEKTION FOR

[10]

NEIDHART F, 1988, SELBSTSTEUERUNGSPROZ

← 1 2 →