NONINVASIVE DETECTION OF HEART-TRANSPLANT REJECTION WITH POSITRON EMISSION SCINTIGRAPHY

被引:21
作者
HOFF, SJ
STEWART, JR
FRIST, WH
KESSLER, RM
SANDLER, MP
ATKINSON, JB
VOTAW, J
CAREY, JA
ANSARI, MS
MERRILL, WH
机构
[1] VANDERBILT UNIV,MED CTR,DEPT CARDIAC & THORAC SURG,NASHVILLE,TN 37240
[2] VANDERBILT UNIV,MED CTR,DEPT PATHOL,NASHVILLE,TN 37240
[3] VANDERBILT UNIV,MED CTR,DEPT RADIOL,NASHVILLE,TN 37240
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0003-4975(92)90313-S
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Positron emission tomography has recently been used to evaluate ischemic heart disease through changes in myocardial blood flow and carbohydrate metabolism. Positron-emitting tracers were evaluated for their ability to detect acute allograft rejection after heterotopic cardiac transplantation in the rat. Sham-operated controls, non-rejecting isografts, and rejecting allografts were evaluated. Decay-corrected uptake of (NH3)-N-13 and F-18 2-fluoro 2-deoxyglucose (FDG) reflects blood flow and glucose flux, respectively. Histologic examination of rejecting allografts documented mild rejection at 4 days and severe acute rejection by 8 days. All isografts were free from rejection. Uptake of FDG is greater in rejecting allografts than in nonrejecting isografts during both severe rejection (2.4% +/- 0.8% versus 0.7% +/- 0.4%; p < 0.02) and mild rejection (2.1% +/- 0.6% versus 0.4% +/- 0.1%; p < 0.02). Uptake of NH3 in severely rejected grafts is reduced compared with nonrejecting grafts (0.6% +/- 0.3% versus 1.7% +/- 1.1%; p < 0.02). There is no difference in NH3 uptake during mild rejection (1.8% +/- 0.7% versus 1.3% +/- 0.3%; p > 0.05). Uptake of FDG and NH3 in native hearts of animals from all experimental groups is not significantly different from that in sham-operated controls. Glucose may be a preferred metabolic substrate during rejection. Our data support a humoral mechanism for substrate preference during transplant rejection and a potential diagnostic role for positron emission tomography.
引用
收藏
页码:572 / 577
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   IMAGING OF CARDIAC ALLOGRAFT-REJECTION IN DOGS USING IN-111 MONOCLONAL ANTIMYOSIN FAB [J].
ADDONIZIO, LJ ;
MICHLER, RE ;
MARBOE, C ;
ESSER, PE ;
JOHNSON, LL ;
SELDIN, DW ;
GERSONY, WM ;
ALDERSON, PO ;
ROSE, EA ;
CANNON, PJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1987, 9 (03) :555-564
[2]   MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING OF CARDIAC TRANSPLANTS - THE EVALUATION OF REJECTION OF CARDIAC ALLOGRAFTS WITH AND WITHOUT IMMUNOSUPPRESSION [J].
AHERNE, T ;
TSCHOLAKOFF, D ;
FINKBEINER, W ;
SECHTEM, U ;
DERUGIN, N ;
YEE, E ;
HIGGINS, CB .
CIRCULATION, 1986, 74 (01) :145-156
[3]  
ALIVIZATOS PA, 1985, TRANSPLANT P, V17, P614
[4]  
ARENDA D, 1989, T P, V21, P2562
[5]  
Billingham M E, 1990, Cardiovasc Clin, V20, P71
[6]  
BROWN TR, 1985, CIRCULATION, V72, P18
[7]   REGIONAL PERFUSION, GLUCOSE-METABOLISM, AND WALL MOTION IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC Q-WAVE INFARCTIONS - EVIDENCE FOR PERSISTENCE OF VIABLE TISSUE IN SOME INFARCT REGIONS BY POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY [J].
BRUNKEN, R ;
TILLISCH, J ;
SCHWAIGER, M ;
CHILD, JS ;
MARSHALL, R ;
MANDELKERN, M ;
PHELPS, ME ;
SCHELBERT, HR .
CIRCULATION, 1986, 73 (05) :951-963
[8]  
Brunken R C, 1989, Cardiol Clin, V7, P607
[9]   NONINVASIVE DETECTION OF REJECTION OF TRANSPLANTED HEARTS WITH INDIUM-111-LABELED LYMPHOCYTES [J].
EISEN, HJ ;
EISENBERG, SB ;
SAFFITZ, JE ;
BOLMAN, RM ;
SOBEL, BE ;
BERGMANN, SR .
CIRCULATION, 1987, 75 (04) :868-876
[10]  
FRIST W, 1987, CIRCULATION, V76, P81