FRUIT TO FLOWER RATIOS AND TRADE-OFFS IN SIZE AND NUMBER

被引:45
作者
MORGAN, M
机构
[1] Department of Ecology and Evolution, The University of Chicago, Chicago, 60637, IL
关键词
FRUIT TO FLOWER RATIOS; PLANT REPRODUCTION; ESS ANALYSIS; SIZE NUMBER TRADE-OFF; SEX ALLOCATION THEORY;
D O I
10.1007/BF01237740
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Hermaphroditic flowering plants commonly produce many more flowers than fruits. To interpret this observation, I suggest an explanation based on trade-offs occurring between the size and the number of flowers and fruits that mature when resources are limiting. I make this suggestion concrete with the aid of a phenotypic model analysed using the ESS approach, The model includes resource allocations to male and female reproductive structures at the time of flowering and to fruit maturation. The formulation allows for non-linear relations between opportunities for fertility gain on the one hand and flower and fruit size and number on the other. Results of the model indicate that fewer fruits will be matured than flowers produced, even in the absence of previously suggested factors such as pollinator limitation and bet-hedging in the face of environmental variability. Model results emphasize the distinction between flower versus inflorescence contributions to male and female reproductive success. Analysis also shows that the fruit to flower ratio in hermaphroditic plants will be lower than that in female plants, in accord with broad taxonomic surveys. Finally, results obtained lead to empirically testable predictions about the relationship between flower size, fruit size and the fruit to flower ratio. Methods to test these predictions are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 232
页数:14
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Ayre D.J., Whelan R.J., Factors controlling fruit set in hermaphroditic plants: studies with the Australian Proteaceae, Trends Ecol. Evol., 4, pp. 267-72, (1989)
[2]  
Bawa K.S., Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 11, pp. 15-39, (1980)
[3]  
Bawa K.S., Opler P.A., Dioecism in tropical forest trees, Evolution, 29, pp. 167-79, (1975)
[4]  
Bell G., On the function of flowers, Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, 224, pp. 223-65, (1985)
[5]  
Brunet J., Sex allocation in hermaphroditic plants, Trends Ecol. Evol., 7, pp. 79-84, (1992)
[6]  
Calvo R.N., Horvitz C.C., Pollinator limitation, cost of reproduction, and fitness in plants: a transition-matrix demographic approach, Am. Nat., 136, pp. 499-516, (1990)
[7]  
Charlesworth B., Charlesworth D., A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy, The American Naturalist, 112, pp. 975-97, (1978)
[8]  
Charlesworth D., Evolution of low female fertility in plants: pollen limitation, resource allocation, and genetic load, Trends Ecol. Evol., 4, pp. 289-92, (1989)
[9]  
Charlesworth D., Charlesworth B., Allocation of resources to male and female functions in hermaphrodites, Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 15, pp. 57-74, (1981)
[10]  
Charlesworth D., Morgan M.T., Allocation of resources to sex functions in flowering plants, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, 332, pp. 91-102, (1991)