EPIDEMIOLOGIC AND CLINICAL ASPECTS OF ANIMAL BITE INJURIES

被引:87
作者
KIZER, KW [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF LOS ANGELES HOSP,DEPT EMERGENCY,LOS ANGELES,CA
来源
JACEP-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS | 1979年 / 8卷 / 04期
关键词
bites and stings epidemiology;
D O I
10.1016/S0361-1124(79)80339-1
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
During 1975, 332 animal bite injuries accounted for 1.2% of all surgical problems treated at the UCLA Hospital Emergency Department. Data on 307 bite injuries were available and analyzed for environmental, animal, human, interaction, and clinical factors. More than half of the dog bites and almost three fourths of the cat bites-scratches happened at or near the victims' homes. Dog bites were almost twice as common among men, while cat bites-scratches were twice as common among women. Of the incidents in which ownership information was available, 85% of dog bites and 80% of cat bites-scratches were from an animal belonging to the victim, his family or friends, or another known person. Forty-three percent of dog bites, and 52% of cat bites-scratches were provoked, that is, happened while the victim was interacting with the animal. Of bites of the head and/or neck, 38% injured the upper lip; 17% of dog bites injured the eye or adjacent tissues; 48% were in children less than ten-years-old. One fifth of cat bites-scratches involved the head and/or neck, 60% of these injured orbital or periorbital tissues. Over 2% of patients were hospitalized. Five percent of dog bite victims and 29% of cat bite-scratch victims returned with complications, mostly cellulitis or lymphangitis. Pasteurella multocida was the most common pathogen cultured, as evidenced by the 50% and 80% culture-positive rates for dog and cat bite-scratches respectively in this series. © 1979 American College of Emergency Physicians.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 141
页数:8
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
Klein, Friendly dog syndrome, NY State J Med, 66, pp. 2306-2309, (1966)
[2]  
Cohen, Community health and animal populations, Arch Environ Health, 17, pp. 1-3, (1968)
[3]  
Beck, The public health implications of urban dogs, Am J Public Health, 65, pp. 1315-1318, (1975)
[4]  
Feldman, Carding, Free-roaming urban pets, Health Services Reports, 88, pp. 956-962, (1973)
[5]  
Robinson, Canis familiaris, N Engl J Med, 290, pp. 1378-1379, (1974)
[6]  
Sheridan, Dogs, cats and other pets, Practitioner, 215, pp. 172-177, (1975)
[7]  
Carithers, Pets in the home: Incidence and significance, Pediatrics, 21, pp. 840-848, (1958)
[8]  
Currier, McCroan, Dreesen, Et al., Epidemiology of antirabies treatment in Georgia, 1967–71, Public Health Rep, 90, pp. 435-439, (1975)
[9]  
Schnurrenberger, Martin, Meerdink, Et al., Epidemiology of human exposure to rabid animals in Illinois, Public Health Rep, 84, pp. 1078-1084, (1969)
[10]  
Bennett, Man's best friend?, Can Med Assoc J, 116, (1977)