BIOEFFECTS IN ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY

被引:18
作者
CARSTENSEN, EL
DUCK, FA
MELTZER, RS
SCHWARZ, KQ
KELLER, B
机构
[1] Departments of Electrical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
[2] Departments of Cardiology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
[3] Rochester Center for Biomedical Ultrasound, The University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
[4] Wessex Regional Medical Physics Service, Royal United Hospital, Bath
来源
ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY-A JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ULTRASOUND AND ALLIED TECHNIQUES | 1992年 / 9卷 / 06期
关键词
BIOEFFECTS; ULTRASOUND; HEATING; CAVITATION; THERMAL INDEX; MECHANICAL INDEX;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-8175.1992.tb00506.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Two mechanisms have been identified through which ultrasound as it is used clinically could produce biologically significant effects. One is heating that results from the absorption of ultrasonic energy by tissues. The other is cavitation, the ultrasonic actuation of gas bodies including the potentially violent collapse of small gas bodies in or near tissue that is sometimes called transient or inertial cavitation. The heart, itself, is well perfused and the likelihood of significant heating of the heart tissues in the most extreme conditions known today is negligible. Lung also appears to be relatively immune to heating under diagnostic exposure conditions. In normal echocardiographic procedures, the only tissues that need serious consideration are the ribs. Under extreme conditions, ultrasonic heating of the bone might be as great as 6-degrees-C. Nonthermal action of ultrasound has been demonstrated to cause lung hemorrhage at pressure levels on the order of 1 MPa. Although many diagnostic devices produce focal pressures greater than this amount, it appears unlikely that hemorrhage will occur in normal echocardiographic applications. Under certain conditions, pulsed ultrasound can either stimulate or modify the contraction of the heart but the exposures required are not used in normal echocardiographic applications. Since specific devices have been identified who's outputs approach levels required to produce thermal and nonthermal effects, the user should be aware of potential biological effects,particularly in pediatric or obstetric applications, as output levels increase.
引用
收藏
页码:605 / 623
页数:19
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Bacon DR, Carstensen EL, Measurement of enhanced heating due to ultrasound absorption in the presence of nonlinear propagation, (1989)
[2]  
Exposure criteria for diagnostic ultrasound. Part I. Criteria based on thermal mechanisms, (1992)
[3]  
Bly SHP, Vlahovich S, Mabee PR, Et al., Upper limits to fetal temperature elevations during discrete mode pulsed Doppler transabdominal examinations, Ultrasound Med Biol, 18, (1992)
[4]  
Duck FA, Starritt HC, ter Haar GR, Et al., Surface heating of diagnostic ultrasound transducers, Br J Radiol, 62, (1989)
[5]  
Duck FA, Martin K, Trends in diagnostic ultrasound exposure, Phys Med Biol, 36, (1991)
[6]  
Drewniak JL, Carnes KI, Dunn F, Measured temperature rise in fetal bone exposed, in vitro, to ultrasound, J Acoust Soc Am, 86, (1988)
[7]  
Carstensen EL, Child SZ, Norton S, Et al., Ultrasonic heating of the skull, J Acoust Soc Am, 87, (1990)
[8]  
Hartman CL, Child SZ, Penney DP, Et al., Ultrasonic heating of lung tissue, J Acoust Soc Am, 91, (1992)
[9]  
ter Haar G, Duck F, Starritt H, Et al., Biophysical characterisation of diagnostic ultrasound equipment—Preliminary results, Phys Med Biol, 34, (1989)
[10]  
Ide M, Acoustic data of Japanese ultrasonic equipment, Ultrasound Med Biol, 15, (1989)