THE RELUCTANCE OF HOUSE STAFF TO PERFORM MOUTH-TO-MOUTH RESUSCITATION IN THE INPATIENT SETTING - WHAT ARE THE CONSIDERATIONS

被引:59
作者
BRENNER, B
STARK, B
KAUFFMAN, J
机构
[1] Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, UCLA Center for the Health Sciences, Los Angeles, CA 90048
[2] Department of Medicine, Loma Linda, School of Medicine, Loma Linda
关键词
CARDIAC ARREST; CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS; ACQUIRED IMMUNODEFICIENCY SYNDROME; BASIC LIFE SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1016/0300-9572(94)90063-9
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: Medical house staff are required to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) as part of their job responsibilities. Previously it has been shown that house staff are reluctant to perform mouth-to-mouth resuscitation (MMR) in an out of hospital setting. Therefore, whether reluctance to perform MMR extends to the inpatient setting, and, if so, the reasons for this reluctance were investigated. Design: All 74 internal medicine house officers of a large metropolitan hospital responded to presentations of hypothetical inpatient cardiac arrest scenarios to assess their willingness to perform MMR. Setting: A 1200 bed university-affiliate teaching hospital in Los Angeles, California. Subjects: All categorical internal medicine house officers at this hospital. Interventions: This study is a survey which concerns whether the house officer would perform mouth-to-mouth resuscitation in different hypothetical cardiac arrest scenarios, Results: Forty-five percent would perform MMR on an unknown patient and 39% would perform MMR in the elderly patient scenario. Only 16% would do MMR on a patient with a small amount of blood on his lips and only 7% would perform MMR on a patient with presumed acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, Medical housestaff were much more reluctant to perform MMR on elderly, trauma, or presumed immunodeficient patients in an inpatient setting than in an outpatient setting, All house staff that indicated their unwillingness to perform MMR cited fear of human immunodeficiency virus infection as their reason. Conclusion: Medical housestaff are quite reluctant to perform MMR in an inpatient setting. Thus, educating the medical house staff about the percent of patients that survive inpatient cardiac arrest and the actual risks of contracting infectious diseases, especially HIV infections, from MMR and preventative measures, such as effective barrier masks, should result in an increased willingness of physicians to perform MMR or mouth-to-mask ventilation on inpatients.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 193
页数:9
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Cobb, Hallstrom, Thompson, Et al., Community cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Ann Rev Med, 31, pp. 453-462, (1980)
[2]  
Cobb, Hallstrom, Community-based cardiopulmonary resuscitation: what have we learned?, Ann NY Acad Sci, 382, pp. 330-342, (1982)
[3]  
Debard, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: analysis of six years experience and review of the literature, Ann Emerg Med, 10, pp. 408-416, (1981)
[4]  
Bedell, Delblanco, Cook, Et al., Survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the hospital, New Engl J Med, 309, pp. 569-576, (1983)
[5]  
Rosenberg, Wang, Hoffman-Wilde, Et al., Results of cardiopulmonary resusciation: failure to predict survival in two community hospitals, Arch Int Med, 153, pp. 1370-1375, (1993)
[6]  
Jastremski, In-hospital cardiac arrest, Annals of Emergency Medicine, 22, pp. 141-145, (1993)
[7]  
Ornato, Hallagan, McMahan, Et al., Attitudes of BCLS instructors about mouth-to-mouth resusciation during the AIDS epidemic, Ann Emerg Med, 19, pp. 151-156, (1990)
[8]  
Brenner, Kauffman, Reluctance of physicians and nurses to perform mouth-to-mouth resuscitation, Arch Int Med, 153, pp. 1763-1769, (1993)
[9]  
Locke, Sanders, Berg, Et al., The impact of concerns about mouth-to-mouth contact during CPR, Presented at American Heart Association, (1993)
[10]  
Firefighters won't respond to AIDS sufferers' calls, Phoenix Gazette, 9 A, (1991)