A 5-YEAR MULTICENTER STUDY OF THE SUSCEPTIBILITY OF THE BACTEROIDES-FRAGILIS GROUP ISOLATES TO CEPHALOSPORINS, CEPHAMINS, PENICILLINS, CLINDAMYCIN, AND METRONIDAZOLE IN THE UNITED-STATES

被引:36
作者
ALDRIDGE, KE
GELFAND, M
RELLER, LB
AYERS, LW
PIERSON, CL
SCHOENKNECHT, F
TILTON, RC
WILKINS, J
HENDERBERG, A
SCHIRO, DD
JOHNSON, M
JANNEY, A
SANDERS, CV
机构
[1] METHODIST HOSP, MEMPHIS, TN USA
[2] DUKE UNIV, MED CTR, DURHAM, NC USA
[3] OHIO STATE UNIV, COLL MED, COLUMBUS, OH 43210 USA
[4] UNIV MICHIGAN, MED CTR, ANN ARBOR, MI USA
[5] UNIV WASHINGTON, MED CTR, SEATTLE, WA 98195 USA
[6] UNIV CONNECTICUT, SCH MED, FARMINGTON, CT USA
[7] UNIV SO CALIF, LOS ANGELES CTY MED CTR, LOS ANGELES, CA 90033 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0732-8893(94)90026-4
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Over 2800 clinical strains of the Bacteroides fragilis group were collected during a 5-year period from ten geographically separate sites and tested for their susceptibility to various antimicrobial agents using a broth microdilution method. Among the cephalosporins, ceftizoxime was the most active (13% resistance) and importantly exhibited relatively equal activity against both B. fragilis species and non-B. fragilis species. Cefotaxime exhibited similar activity with an overall resistance rate of 18%. Both ceftriaxone and cefoperazone were appreciably less active cephalosporins especially against non-B. fragilis species. With regard to cephamycins, cefoxitin (MIC(90), 32 mu g/ml) was move active than cefotetan (MIC(90) greater than or equal to 256 mu g/ml) and cefmetazole (MIC(90), 64 mu g/ml). Non-B. fragilis species were highly resistant to cefotetan and cefmetazole. Imipenem was highly active against all strains with the exception of four strains of B. fragilis. Ampicillin-sulbactam, amoxicillin-clavulanate, piperacillin-tazobactam, and cefoperazone-sulbactam were all highly active with resistance rates <2%. No resistance was detected to metronidazole, whereas 14% of isolates were resistant to clindamycin. When compared with other studies, these findings underscore the wide variability in susceptibility patterns reported nationwide and the need to continue monitoring these patterns to aid in choosing the most active compounds for therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 241
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
ALDRIDGE K E, 1988, Advances in Therapy, V5, P273
[2]   COMPARISON OF THE ACTIVITIES OF PENICILLIN-G AND NEW BETA-LACTAM ANTIBIOTICS AGAINST CLINICAL ISOLATES OF BACTEROIDES SPECIES [J].
ALDRIDGE, KE ;
SANDERS, CV ;
JANNEY, A ;
FARO, S ;
MARIER, RL .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1984, 26 (03) :410-413
[3]   ANTIBIOTIC-DEPENDENT AND METHOD-DEPENDENT VARIATION IN SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING RESULTS OF BACTEROIDES-FRAGILIS GROUP ISOLATES [J].
ALDRIDGE, KE ;
SANDERS, CV .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1987, 25 (12) :2317-2321
[4]   COMPARISON OF INVITRO ANTIBIOGRAMS OF BACTEROIDES-FRAGILIS GROUP ISOLATES - DIFFERENCES IN RESISTANCE RATES IN 2 INSTITUTIONS BECAUSE OF DIFFERENCES IN SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING METHODOLOGY [J].
ALDRIDGE, KE ;
WEXLER, HM ;
SANDERS, CV ;
FINEGOLD, SM .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1990, 34 (01) :179-181
[5]  
[Anonymous], ANAEROBIC INFECTIONS
[6]   COMPARATIVE ACTIVITY OF BETA-LACTAMASE INHIBITORS YTR 830, CLAVULANATE, AND SULBACTAM COMBINED WITH BETA-LACTAMS AGAINST BETA-LACTAMASE-PRODUCING ANAEROBES [J].
APPELBAUM, PC ;
JACOBS, MR ;
SPANGLER, SK ;
YAMABE, S .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1986, 30 (05) :789-791
[7]   INVITRO SUSCEPTIBILITY OF THE BACTEROIDES-FRAGILIS GROUP TO CEFOPERAZONE, AMPICILLIN, TICARCILLIN AND AMOXICILLIN COMBINED WITH BETA-LACTAMASE INHIBITORS [J].
BARRY, AL ;
JONES, RN ;
PACKER, RR .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1986, 17 (01) :125-126
[8]  
BENNION RS, 1992, DRUG INVEST S1, V4, P7
[9]   SURVEY OF BACTEROIDES-FRAGILIS SUSCEPTIBILITY PATTERNS IN FRANCE [J].
BREUIL, J ;
BURNAT, C ;
PATEY, O ;
DUBLANCHET, A .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1989, 24 (01) :69-75
[10]   BACTEROIDES-FRAGILIS RESISTANT TO METRONIDAZOLE, CLINDAMYCIN AND CEFOXITIN [J].
BROGAN, O ;
GARNETT, PA ;
BROWN, R .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1989, 23 (04) :660-662