REVISED ESTIMATES OF DIAGNOSTIC-TEST SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY IN SUSPECTED BILIARY-TRACT DISEASE

被引:178
作者
SHEA, JA
BERLIN, JA
ESCARCE, JJ
CLARKE, JR
KINOSIAN, BP
CABANA, MD
TSAI, WW
HORANGIC, N
MALET, PF
SCHWARTZ, JS
WILLIAMS, SV
机构
[1] UNIV PENN,CTR CLIN EPIDEMIOL & BIOSTAT,PHILADELPHIA,PA 19104
[2] UNIV PENN,LEONARD DAVIS INST HLTH ECON,PHILADELPHIA,PA 19104
[3] UNIV PENN,DEPT MED,DIV GASTROENTEROL,PHILADELPHIA,PA 19104
[4] MED COLL PENN,DEPT SURG,PHILADELPHIA,PA 19129
[5] DEPT VET AFFAIRS MED CTR,PHILADELPHIA,PA 19104
[6] THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIV,JEFFERSON MED COLL,PHILADELPHIA,PA 19107
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.154.22.2573
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study was to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests for gallstones and acute cholecystitis. Methods: All English-language articles published from 1966 through 1992 about tests used in the diagnosis of biliary tract disease were identified through MEDLINE. From 1614 titles, 666 abstracts were examined and 322 articles were read to identify 61 articles with information about sensitivity and specificity. Application of exclusion criteria based on clinical and methodologic criteria left 30 articles for analysis. Cluster-sampling methods were adapted to obtain combined estimates of sensitivities and specificities. Adjustments were made to estimates that were biased because the gold standard was applied preferentially to patients with positive test results. Results: Ultrasound has the best unadjusted sensitivity (0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.95 to 0.99) and specificity (0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.88 to 1.00) for evaluating patients with suspected gallstones. Adjusted values are 0.84 (0.76 to 0.92) and 0.99 (0.97 to 1.00), respectively. Adjusted and unadjusted results for oral cholecystogram were lower. Radionuclide scanning has the best sensitivity (0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.96 to 0.98) and specificity (0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.86 to 0.95) for evaluating patients with suspected acute cholecystitis; test performance is unaffected by delayed imaging. Unadjusted sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in evaluating patients with suspected acute cholecystitis are 0.94 (0.92 to 0.96) and 0.78 (0.61 to 0.96); adjusted values are 0.88 (0.74 to 1.00) and 0.80 (0.62 to 0.98). Conclusions: Ultrasound is superior to oral cholecystogram for diagnosing cholelithiasis, and radionuclide scanning is the test of choice for acute cholecystitis. However, sensitivities and specificities are somewhat lower than commonly reported. We recommend estimates that are midway between the adjusted and unadjusted values.
引用
收藏
页码:2573 / 2581
页数:9
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, AM J SURG, V165, P390
[2]   CHOLELITHIASIS - EVALUATION WITH CT [J].
BARAKOS, JA ;
RALLS, PW ;
LAPIN, SA ;
JOHNSON, MB ;
RADIN, DR ;
COLLETTI, PM ;
BOSWELL, WD ;
HALLS, JM .
RADIOLOGY, 1987, 162 (02) :415-418
[3]   HEPATOBILIARY SCINTIGRAPHY - INCREASING THE ACCURACY OF THE PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS [J].
BEDNARZ, GM ;
KALFF, V ;
KELLY, MJ .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1986, 145 (07) :316-318
[4]   DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS USING HEPATOBILIARY SCAN WITH TECHNETIUM-99M PIPIDA [J].
BENNETT, MT ;
SHELDON, MI ;
DOSREMEDIOS, LV ;
WEBER, PM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1981, 142 (03) :338-343
[5]   THE RADIOLOGICAL-DIAGNOSIS OF GALLBLADDER-DISEASE - AN IMAGING SYMPOSIUM [J].
BERK, RN ;
FERRUCCI, JT ;
FORDTRAN, JS ;
COOPERBERG, PL ;
WEISSMANN, HS .
RADIOLOGY, 1981, 141 (01) :49-56
[6]  
BOUTKAN H, 1984, NETH J SURG, V36, P124
[7]  
BRUNKWALL J, 1985, ACTA CHIR SCAND, V151, P139
[8]  
COCHRAN WG, 1977, SAMPLING TECHNIQUES, P64
[9]   RADIONUCLIDE ANGIOGRAPHY IN SUSPECTED ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS - FURTHER OBSERVATIONS [J].
COLLETTI, PM ;
CIRIMELLI, KM ;
RADIN, DR ;
CHANDRASOMA, P ;
RALLS, PW ;
SIEGEL, ME .
CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1989, 14 (12) :867-873
[10]  
COOPERBERG PL, 1980, NEW ENGL J MED, V302, P1277, DOI 10.1056/NEJM198006053022303