COMPARISON OF 3 IMMUNOASSAYS FOR IMMUNE-COMPLEXES IN RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS

被引:63
作者
GUPTA, RC
MCDUFFIE, FC
HUSTON, KA
TAPPEINER, G
MEURER, M
JORDON, RE
LUTHRA, HS
HUNDER, GG
ILSTRUP, D
机构
[1] MAYO MED SCH,MAYO CLIN & FDN,DEPT MED,ROCHESTER,MN 55901
[2] MAYO MED SCH,MAYO CLIN & FDN,DEPT IMMUNOL,ROCHESTER,MN 55901
[3] MAYO MED SCH,MAYO CLIN & FDN,DEPT DERMATOL,ROCHESTER,MN 55901
来源
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM | 1979年 / 22卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1002/art.1780220501
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Three widely used radioassays that depend on different principles for the measurement of circulating immune complexes (CIC) in biologic fluids are the monoclonal rheumatoid factor (mRF), Raji cell, and C1q binding tests. A comparison of the ability of these methods to measure immune complex‐like material in 71 sera and 30 synovial fluids of 91 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was carried out by a group working in adjacent laboratories in a single institution. The highest number of abnormal levels in the seropositive group was detected by the C1q binding assay (91%). Levels of CIC by the mRF and Raji cell tests were elevated in 81% and 76% of the patients, respectively. The closest correlation was between the Raji and mRF cell tests (r = 0.44 and P = 0.002) although one depends on complement fixation and one does not. Though significant correlations between the levels of CIC determined by the Clq test and either the mRF (P = 0.2) or Raji cell (P = 0.3) assay were not found in this group, 59% of the samples had elevated levels by all three tests. The frequency of CIC in the sera of patients with seronegative RA was much lower, with the Clq test again giving the highest number of abnormal results (29% versus 16% and 12% for the Raji and mRF tests). In view of the technical problems associated with these tests, particularly lack of a uniform reliable standard, it is likely that all three tests measure the same material in most RA sera and that some of the differences observed are related to inherent variability in the tests themselves rather than intrinsic differences among the CIC detected in these samples. Copyright © 1979 American College of Rheumatology
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 439
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] AGNELLO V, 1970, IMMUNOLOGY, V19, P909
  • [2] MODIFICATIONS OF MICRO AGAR PRECIPITIN TEST
    AUERNHEIMER, AH
    ATCHLEY, FO
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1962, 38 (05) : 548 - &
  • [3] IMMUNOPATHOLOGIC STUDY OF SURAL NERVES IN RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS
    CONN, DL
    MCDUFFIE, FC
    DYCK, PJ
    [J]. ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1972, 15 (02): : 135 - +
  • [4] GUPTA RC, 1978, IMMUNOLOGY, V34, P751
  • [5] GUPTA RC, 1976, J LAB CLIN MED, V88, P183
  • [6] HEUSSER C, 1973, J IMMUNOL, V110, P820
  • [7] KABAT EA, 1961, KABAT MAYERS EXPERIM, P559
  • [8] KINSELLA TD, 1969, CLIN EXP IMMUNOL, V4, P265
  • [9] Lambert P H, 1975, Rheumatology, V6, P52
  • [10] LAMBERT PH, 1978, J CLIN LAB IMMUNOL, V1, P1