ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF EXPRESSED PREFERENCE MEASURES OF VALUE

被引:4
作者
GREGORY, R
MACGREGOR, D
LICHTENSTEIN, S
机构
[1] Decision Research, Eugene
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0167-2681(92)90005-V
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper proposes an approach for assessing the quality of expressed preference measures of value. A set of attributes relevant to public policy and social choice was used to distinguish between private and public goods. The relationship between the attribute variables and four different expressions of value (willingness to pay, cost, importance, and benefit) was used as a basis for examining value definitions. The results suggest that people generally define value in terms that are more complex than can be captured by a single, and particularly a single monetary, expression of value alone. Implications for public policy are discussed in terms of developing higher-quality value measures through a better understanding of their attribute components.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 292
页数:16
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Ajzen I., 1980, UNDERSTANDING ATTITU, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
[2]  
BELL P, 1984, TEST ORDERED LOGIT M
[3]  
BOHM P, 1971, SWED J ECON, V73, P65
[4]  
BROOKSHIRE DS, 1982, AM ECON REV, V72, P165
[5]  
Cummings R.G., 1986, VALUING ENV GOODS AS
[6]  
Desvousges WH, 1983, COMP ALTERNATIVE APP
[7]  
Fischhoff B, 1988, J RISK UNCERTAINTY, V1, P147, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00056166
[8]   THE VALUE OF SAFETY - RESULTS OF A NATIONAL SAMPLE SURVEY [J].
JONES-LEE, MW ;
HAMMERTON, M ;
PHILIPS, PR .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1985, 95 (377) :49-72
[9]   WILLINGNESS TO PAY AND COMPENSATION DEMANDED - EXPERIMENTAL-EVIDENCE OF AN UNEXPECTED DISPARITY IN MEASURES OF VALUE [J].
KNETSCH, JL ;
SINDEN, JA .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1984, 99 (03) :507-521
[10]   NEW APPROACH TO CONSUMER THEORY [J].
LANCASTER, KJ .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1966, 74 (02) :132-157