A PROCEDURAL MODEL OF VOTING

被引:6
作者
HANSSON, SO
机构
[1] Department of Philosophy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, 75236
关键词
PROCEDURAL PREFERENCES; METAPREFERENCES; PREFERENCES; CHOICE; CONSENSUS; VOTING; STRATEGIC VOTING;
D O I
10.1007/BF00134152
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The formal framework of social choice theory is generalized through the introduction of separate representations of preferences and choices. This makes it possible to treat voting as a procedure in which decisions are actually made by interacting participants, rather than as a mere mechanism for aggregation. The extended framework also allows for non-consequentialist preferences that take procedural factors into account. Concepts such as decisiveness, anonymity, neutrality, and stability are redefined for use in the new context. The formal results obtained confirm the universality of strategic voting.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 301
页数:33
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   BEYOND VOTERS PARADOX [J].
ALLEN, GO .
ETHICS, 1977, 88 (01) :50-61
[2]  
ARROW KJ, 1977, AM ECON REV, V67, P219
[3]  
DUMMETT M, 1985, VOTING PROCEDURES
[4]   METAPREFERENCES AND THE REASONS FOR STABILITY IN SOCIAL CHOICE - THOUGHTS ON BROADENING AND CLARIFYING THE DEBATE [J].
GROFMAN, B ;
UHLANER, C .
THEORY AND DECISION, 1985, 19 (01) :31-50
[5]  
Hansson S.O., 1989, ERKENNTNIS, V31, P1, DOI [10.1007/BF01239128, DOI 10.1007/BF01239128]
[6]   RIGHTS AND THE LIBERAL PARADOXES [J].
HANSSON, SO .
SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 1988, 5 (04) :287-302
[7]  
HANSSON SO, 1992, IN PRESS NOTRE DAME
[8]  
HARSANYI JC, 1977, 5TH P INT C LOG ME 2, P381
[9]   PRACTICE AND PARADOX - A COMMENT ON SOCIAL CHOICE THEORY [J].
KADISH, MR .
ETHICS, 1983, 93 (04) :680-694
[10]  
LINDBERG E, 1988, 191 U UM UM PSYCH RE