EFFECTS OF BONE-MINERAL DENSITY ON PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION

被引:540
作者
HALVORSON, TL [1 ]
KELLEY, LA [1 ]
THOMAS, KA [1 ]
WHITECLOUD, TS [1 ]
COOK, SD [1 ]
机构
[1] TULANE UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT ORTHOPAED,1430 TULANE AVE,NEW ORLEANS,LA 70112
关键词
Bone mineral density; Lumbar spine; Pedicle screws; Pullout strength;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199411000-00008
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. In an attempt to evaluate the effects of bone mineral density on the quality of fixation of pedicle screws in the lumbar spine, the axial pullout force was determined and compared in normal and osteoporotic human lumbar spines. Objectives. Four techniques of screw hole preparation were evaluated. Two pedicle screw/offset laminar hook constructs also were evaluated to determine whether the adjunct fixation of the laminar hooks would improve quality of fixation to a level sufficient to allow their use in the osteoporotic lumbar spine. Methods. Pedicle screws were inserted by one of the listed techniques into fresh frozen cadaveric human spines. The fixation strength then was evaluated by pullout on a uniaxial testing frame. Results. Bone mineral density was a strong influence on axial pullout force. In normal bone, the method of screw hole preparation did not significantly affect the quality of fixation. However, in the osteoporotic spine, either an untapped screw hole or the tapping of a screw hole with a 5.5 mm tap improved the pullout force a statistically significant amount (P < 0.003). Also, a pedicle screw with offset hooks at two adjacent levels improved the fixation significantly, increasing the pullout force to twice the expected value. Conclusion. Pedicle screw pullout strength was highly correlated with bone mineral density. A 5.5 mm tap or preparation with a ganglion knife improved pullout strength. Use of pedicle screws in conjunction with laminar hooks at two levels improved pullout strength.
引用
收藏
页码:2415 / 2420
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Ashman R.B., Galpin R.D., Corin J.D., Johnston C.E., Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw instrumentation systems in a corpectomy model, Spine, 14, pp. 1398-1405, (1989)
[2]  
Esses S.I., Gednar D.A., The spinal pedicle screw: Techniques and systems, Orthop Rev, 18, pp. 676-682, (1989)
[3]  
Gurr K.R., McAfee P.C., Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in adults: A preliminary report, Spine, 13, pp. 510-520, (1988)
[4]  
Gurr K.R., McAfee P.C., Shih C., Biomechanical analysis of anterior and posterior instrumentation systems after corpectomy, J Bone Joint Surg [Am], 70, pp. 1182-1191, (1988)
[5]  
Kleeman B.C., Gerhart T.N., Hayes W.C., Augmenting Screw Fixation in Osteoporotic Trabecular Bone, (1987)
[6]  
Koranyi E., Bowman C.E., Knecht C.D., Janssen M., Holding power of orthopaedic screws in bone, Clin Orthop, 72, pp. 283-286, (1970)
[7]  
McAfee P.C., Farey I.D., Sutteriin C.E., Gurr K.R., Warden K.E., Cunningham B.W., Device related osteoporosis with spinal instrumentation, Spine, 14, pp. 919-926, (1989)
[8]  
Luque E.R., Interpeduncular segmental fixation, Clin Orthop, 203, pp. 54-57, (1986)
[9]  
Nunamaker D.M., Perren S.M., Force measurements in screw fixation, J Biomech, 9, pp. 669-675, (1976)
[10]  
Moran J.M., Berg W.S., Berry J.L., Geiger J.M., Steffee A.D., Transpedicular screw fixation, J Orthop Res, 7, pp. 107-114, (1989)