COMPARISON OF PRONY AND EIGENANALYSIS FOR POWER-SYSTEM CONTROL DESIGN

被引:50
作者
GRUND, CE
PASERBA, JJ
HAUER, JF
NILSSON, S
机构
[1] BONNEVILLE POWER ADM,PORTLAND,OR
[2] EPRI,DIV ELECT SYST,TRANSMISS SUBSTN PROGRAM,PALO ALTO,CA
关键词
POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS; FREQUENCY DOMAIN ANALYSIS [2; CONTROL DESIGN; PRONY ANALYSIS [4; EIGENANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1109/59.260905
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
This paper describes comparative results of direct (eigenanalysis) and indirect (Prony analysis) methods for generating frequency-domain data for power system control design. The methods are applied to the same model, a medium-scale model of the Midcontinent Area Power Pool (MAPP). Modal parameters (frequencies and damping) and transfer function poles and zeros are compared as calculated by the two methods.
引用
收藏
页码:964 / 971
页数:8
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1984, LINEAR SYSTEM THEORY
[2]  
GRUND CE, 1989, IEEE90THO2923PWR PUB
[3]  
GRUND CE, 1987, SEP CIGRE C AC DC TR
[4]  
GRUND CE, 1989, AUG CIGRE SC 14 C RI
[5]   POWER SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION BY FITTING STRUCTURED MODELS TO MEASURED FREQUENCY-RESPONSE [J].
HAUER, JF .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER APPARATUS AND SYSTEMS, 1982, 101 (04) :915-923
[6]  
HAUER JF, 1991, 1991 IEEE PES WIN M
[7]  
HAUER JF, 1990, IEEE T POWER SYS FEB, P74
[8]  
HAUER JF, 1987, IEEE87TH01875PWR SPE
[9]  
HAUER JF, 1991, IEEE T POWER SYS AUG, P1062
[10]  
HAUER JF, 1989, IEEE CONTROL SYS JAN