RISK-FACTORS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF LYMPH-NODE METASTASIS IN VULVAR SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA

被引:33
作者
BINDER, SW
HUANG, I
FU, YS
HACKER, NF
BEREK, JS
机构
[1] JONSSON COMPREHENS CANC,DEPT PATHOL,LOS ANGELES,CA 90024
[2] UNIV CALIF LOS ANGELES,SCH MED,LOS ANGELES,CA 90024
[3] JONSSON COMPREHENS CANC,DEPT OBSTET & GYNECOL,DIV GYNECOL ONCOL,LOS ANGELES,CA 90024
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0090-8258(90)90298-Y
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
One hundred and ten women who underwent vulvectomy and inguinal-femoral lymphadenectomy for stages I-IV vulvar squamous cell carcinoma were studied. The most important factors that affected the inguinal lymph node status in the order of importance were vascular invasion, clinical stage, tumor thickness, depth of stromal invasion, and amount of keratin. Fourteen (88%) of 16 tumors with vascular invasion in the primary tumor metastasized. In the absence of vascular invasion, 18 (19%) of 94 tumors metastasized. Overall, 82% of tumors were correctly classified into lymph node negative and positive groups on the basis of vascular invasion. Tumor thickness and depth of stromal invasion had a similar accuracy in predicting lymph node status. The risk of lymph node metastasis increased from 0% when tumor thickness or depth of stromal invasion was less than 2 mm, to over 20% when depth of stromal invasion was greater than 2 mm, and to over 40% when tumor thickness exceeded 4 mm. A combination of vascular invasion, tumor thickness (or depth of stromal invasion), and the amount of keratin correctly classified 97% ( 76 78) of the lymph node negative group and 63% ( 20 32) of the positive group with an overall accuracy of 87%. The probability of having lymph node metastasis was computed for individual patients on the basis of one or more pathologic parameters using a logistic regression model. This feasibility is an important step toward individualized therapy for vulvar carcinoma. © 1990.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 16
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   PROGNOSTIC ROLE OF HISTOLOGY IN SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA IN THE VULVAR REGION [J].
ANDREASSON, B ;
BOCK, JE ;
VISFELDT, J .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1982, 14 (03) :373-381
[2]   REGIONAL LYMPH-NODE RECURRENCE FOLLOWING LOCAL EXCISION FOR MICROINVASIVE VULVAR CARCINOMA [J].
ATAMDEDE, F ;
HOOGERLAND, D .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1989, 34 (01) :125-128
[3]  
BARNES AE, 1980, OBSTET GYNECOL, V56, P234
[4]  
BEREK JS, 1989, PRACTICAL GYNECOLOGI, P397
[5]   PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN CARCINOMA OF THE VULVA [J].
BOYCE, J ;
FRUCHTER, RG ;
KASAMBILIDES, E ;
NICASTRI, AD ;
SEDLIS, A ;
REMY, JC .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1985, 20 (03) :364-377
[6]  
CHU J, 1982, OBSTET GYNECOL, V59, P716
[7]   ALTERNATE APPROACH TO EARLY CANCER OF THE VULVA [J].
DISAIA, PJ ;
CREASMAN, WT ;
RICH, WM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1979, 133 (07) :825-832
[8]  
DIXON WJ, 1983, BMDP STATISTICAL SOF
[9]   PROGNOSTIC PARAMETERS IN INVASIVE VULVAR CANCER [J].
DONALDSON, ES ;
POWELL, DE ;
HANSON, MB ;
VANNAGELL, JR .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1981, 11 (02) :184-190
[10]  
DVORETSKY PM, 1984, INT J GYNECOL PATHOL, V3, P331