ANALYSIS OF PATERNITY WITHIN A NATURAL-POPULATION OF CHAMAELIRIUM-LUTEUM .2. PATTERNS OF MALE REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS

被引:68
作者
MEAGHER, TR
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1086/285191
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Male reproductive success in plant populations can be influenced by resources invested in reproductive effort, competition for mating opportunities, and the quality of female mates available. I analyzed the relationship between such ecological factors and male success within a single large population of the dioecious plant Chamaelirium luteum. Male reproductive success had been determined in a previous study using genetic likelihoods of paternity. In the present analysis, no apparent relationship was found between male size (indicative of reproductive effort) and paternal success. An alternating pattern of negative and positive spatial autocor-relation in success was found for the first through tenth nearest neighbors, suggesting local competition among males for matings. Availability of females, as reflected in localized sex ratios, had little influence on male success. Finally, the size of local females, which could limit male success by limiting the total possible seed output, was not related to male success.
引用
收藏
页码:738 / 752
页数:15
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   POLLINATION BY DECEIT, FLORAL SEX-RATIOS AND SEED SET IN DIOECIOUS RUBUS-CHAMAEMORUS L [J].
AGREN, J ;
ELMQVIST, T ;
TUNLID, A .
OECOLOGIA, 1986, 70 (03) :332-338
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1977, POPULATION BIOL PLAN
[3]  
Baker H. G., 1976, Tropical trees: variation, breeding and conservation (ed. J. Burley and B.T. Styles)., P161
[4]   INTRA-SEXUAL SELECTION IN DROSOPHILA [J].
BATEMAN, AJ .
HEREDITY, 1948, 2 (03) :349-368
[5]  
BAWA KS, 1980, EVOLUTION, V34, P467, DOI [10.2307/2408216, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1980.tb04836.x]
[6]   ON THE FUNCTION OF FLOWERS [J].
BELL, G .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY SERIES B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1985, 224 (1235) :223-265
[7]   PATERNITY AND FRUIT PRODUCTION IN TRUMPET CREEPER (CAMPSIS-RADICANS) [J].
BERTIN, RI .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1982, 119 (05) :694-709
[9]  
BROYLES SB, 1990, EVOLUTION, V44, P1454, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb03838.x
[10]  
CAMPBELL DR, 1985, EVOLUTION, V39, P418, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb05678.x