DISEASE-SPECIFIC SURVIVAL FOLLOWING ROUTINE PROSTATE-CANCER SCREENING BY DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION

被引:66
作者
GERBER, GS
THOMPSON, IM
THISTED, R
CHODAK, GW
机构
[1] UNIV CHICAGO HOSP & CLIN,DEPT SURG,DIV UROL,CHICAGO,IL 60637
[2] UNIV CHICAGO HOSP & CLIN,DEPT STAT,CHICAGO,IL 60637
[3] UNIV CHICAGO HOSP & CLIN,DEPT ANESTHESIA & CRIT CARE,CHICAGO,IL 60637
[4] BROOKE ARMY MED CTR,DEPT SURG,UROL SERV,FT SAM HOUSTON,TX 78234
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 1993年 / 269卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.269.1.61
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective.-To assess prostate cancer mortality in men undergoing routine screening by routine digital rectal examination. Design.-Cohort study with a median follow-up period of 75 months. Setting.-Population consisted of volunteers at a university clinic and men in an institutional health maintenance clinic. Patients.-Fifty-six men with a mean age of 65 years (range, 52 to 79 years) diagnosed with prostate cancer. Interventions.-Patients treated initially by observation, external or interstitial radiotherapy, radical prostatectomy, hormone therapy, or combination. Main Outcome Measures.-Kaplan-Meier analysis of time to local progression, distant metastases, death from all causes, and death from prostate cancer. Mantel-Haenszel log-rank statistic was used to compare outcome in men diagnosed on initial examination with those diagnosed on subsequent examinations. Results.-Clinically localized prostate cancer was diagnosed in 73% during an initial examination and in 33% (6/18) during subsequent examinations. Five- and 10-year disease-specific survival was 97% and 86%, respectively, for men diagnosed during the first rectal examination compared with only 81% and 57%, respectively, for men diagnosed on subsequent rectal examinations (P=.02). Conclusion.-Routine screening for prostate cancer by annual digital rectal examination alone may be insufficiently frequent and/or sensitive to prevent significant mortality from this disease.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 64
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
AUBERT R, 1992, MMWR, V41, P401
[2]   SCREENING FOR PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA WITH PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN [J].
BRAWER, MK ;
CHETNER, MP ;
BEATIE, J ;
BUCHNER, DM ;
VESSELLA, RL ;
LANGE, PH .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 147 (03) :841-845
[3]   MEASUREMENT OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN IN SERUM AS A SCREENING-TEST FOR PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
CATALONA, WJ ;
SMITH, DS ;
RATLIFF, TL ;
DODDS, KM ;
COPLEN, DE ;
YUAN, JJJ ;
PETROS, JA ;
ANDRIOLE, GL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 324 (17) :1156-1161
[4]   ASSESSMENT OF SCREENING FOR PROSTATE-CANCER USING THE DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION [J].
CHODAK, GW ;
KELLER, P ;
SCHOENBERG, HW .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1989, 141 (05) :1136-1138
[5]  
Cooner W H, 1987, Ala Med, V56, P13
[6]  
GILBERTSON JA, 1976, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V215, P81
[7]   THE ACCURACY OF THE RECTAL EXAMINATION IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF PROSTATE CARCINOMA [J].
GUINAN, P ;
BUSH, I ;
RAY, V ;
VIETH, R ;
RAO, R ;
BHATTI, R .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1980, 303 (09) :499-503
[8]   EVALUATION OF ANNUAL EXAMINATIONS IN THE DETECTION OF CANCER - SPECIAL REFERENCE TO CANCER OF THE GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT, PROSTATE, BREAST, AND FEMALE GENERATIVE TRACT [J].
JENSON, CB ;
SHAHON, DB ;
WANGENSTEEN, OH .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1960, 174 (14) :1783-1788
[9]   PROSTATE-CANCER - COMPARISON OF TRANS-RECTAL US AND DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION FOR SCREENING [J].
LEE, F ;
LITTRUP, PJ ;
TORPPEDERSEN, ST ;
METTLIN, C ;
MCHUGH, TA ;
GRAY, JM ;
KUMASAKA, GH ;
MCLEARY, RD .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 168 (02) :389-394
[10]   THE NATIONAL SURVEY OF PROSTATE-CANCER IN THE UNITED-STATES BY THE AMERICAN-COLLEGE-OF-SURGEONS [J].
MURPHY, GP ;
NATARAJAN, N ;
PONTES, JE ;
SCHMITZ, RL ;
SMART, CR ;
SCHMIDT, JD ;
METTLIN, C .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1982, 127 (05) :928-934