Comparison of the immediate, residual, and cumulative antibacterial effects of novaderm R, novascrub R, betadine surgical scrub, hibiclens, and liquid soap

被引:39
作者
Faoagali, J
Fong, J
George, N
Mahoney, P
ORourke, V
机构
[1] Departments of Microbiology and Occupational Health, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Herston, QLD
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0196-6553(95)90263-5
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Triclosan (Irgasan), an antibacterial active against staphylococci and coliform bacteria, has been formulated for use as a handwash. There has been only one previous report of the use of the glove juice test to determine the immediate, residual, and cumulative effects of a 1% triclosan-based handwash product. There have been no previous studies on the use of 1% triclosan combined with povidone-iodine (PI) in a handwash product. Methods: The glove juice technique was used to document and compare the immediate, 3-hour residual, and 5-day cumulative effects on the mean log(10) bacterial counts of 1% triclosan-based handwash product and 1% triclosan with 5% PI. A standardized surgical handwashing technique was used before sample collection. These results and the identity and type of the aerobic bacteria cultured from the samples were compared with the results of standardized washing and glove juice sampling with 4% weight/volume chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG), 7.5% PI, and a nonantimicrobial liquid soap. Results: All five tested products showed significant log(10) reduction from baseline on day 1, hour 0 (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the mean log,, bacterial count when 7.5% PI, 4% CHG, and 1% triclosan with 5% PI were compared with each other immediately after washing (p > 0.05). There was a significant difference between 1% triclosan and the liquid soap when they were each compared with 4% CHG, 7.5% PI, and 1% triclosan with 5% PI. There was no statistically significant difference between the 1% triclosan product and the liquid soap (p > 0.20). All products were effective at reducing the immediate bacterial count from the baseline level. All formulations except the liquid soap showed significant cumulative effect (p < 0.05) after multiple washes, with no significant difference between the cumulative effects of the liquid soap and 1% triclosan (p > 0.05). Both products differed significantly (p < 0.05) from the CHG, PI, and triclosan with PI. CHG, PI, and triclosan with PI showed effects significantly different from each other (p < 0.05).
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 343
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Russell, Hugo, Ayliffe, Principles and practice of disinfection and sterilization, (1992)
  • [2] Lilly, Lowbury, Disinfection of the skin with detergent preparations of Irgasan DP 300 and other antiseptics, BMJ, 4, pp. 372-374, (1974)
  • [3] Ojajarvi, An evaluation of antiseptics used for hand disinfection in wards, J Hyg (Lond), 76, pp. 75-82, (1976)
  • [4] Bodey, Ebersole, Hong, Randomized trial of a hexachlorophene preparation and P-300 bacteriostatic soaps, J Invest Dermatol, 67, pp. 532-537, (1976)
  • [5] Namura, Nishijima, McGinley, Leyden, A study of the efficacy of antimicrobial detergents for handwashing: using the full hand touch plates method, J Dermatol, 20, pp. 88-93, (1993)
  • [6] Brady, Johnson, Palmer, Harnesh, Successful control of endemic MRSA in a cardiothoracic surgical unit, Med J Aust, 152, pp. 240-245, (1990)
  • [7] Bartzokas, Corkill, Makin, Evaluation of the skin disinfecting activity and cumulative effect of chlorhexidine and triclosan handwash preparations on hands artificially contaminated with Serratia marcescens, Infect Control, 8, pp. 163-167, (1987)
  • [8] Bartzokas, Corkill, Makin, Pinder, Assessment of the remanent anti-bacterial effect of a 2% triclosan-detergent preparation on the skin, J Hyg (Lond), 91, pp. 521-528, (1983)
  • [9] Uhl, Triclosan-resistant S. aureus, Lancet, 342, (1993)
  • [10] Sasatsu, Shimizer, Noguche, Kono, Triclosan resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Lancet, 341, (1993)