COMPARISON OF AFFINITY MEMBRANES AND CONVENTIONAL AFFINITY MATRICES WITH REGARD TO PROTEIN-PURIFICATION

被引:48
作者
KRAUSE, S [1 ]
KRONER, KH [1 ]
DECKWER, WD [1 ]
机构
[1] GESELL BIOTECHNOL FORSCH GMBH,W-3300 BRAUNSCHWEIG,GERMANY
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF00152781
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Binding capacities for purified malate dehydrogenase from pig heart and malate dehydrogenase from Escherichia coli were determined for different gel matrices and a Cibacron Blue modified membrane. During batch adsorption the membrane has nearly the same capacity as Blue Sepharose. During filtration the effective capacity of the membrane was increased in contrast to Blue Sepharose. With cell homogenates, when used under cross-flow conditions, the membrane displayed better performance than Blue Sepharose.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 204
页数:6
相关论文
共 4 条
[1]  
LOWE CR, 1984, METHOD ENZYMOL, V104, P97
[2]   MEMBRANES IN BIOTECHNOLOGY - STATE OF THE ART [J].
MICHAELS, AS ;
MATSON, SL .
DESALINATION, 1985, 53 (1-3) :231-258
[3]  
SCAWEN MD, 1985, BIOCHEM J, V203, P699
[4]   PURIFICATION OF BACTERIAL MALATE-DEHYDROGENASES BY SELECTIVE ELUTION FROM A TRIAZINYL DYE AFFINITY COLUMN [J].
SMITH, K ;
SUNDARAM, TK ;
KERNICK, M ;
WILKINSON, AE .
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA, 1982, 708 (01) :17-25