COMPUTER-SIMULATION OF ERROR RATES OF POISSON-BASED INTERVAL ESTIMATES OF PLANKTON ABUNDANCE

The routine assignment of error rates (confidence intervals) to Poisson distribution estimates of plankton abundance should be rejected. In addition to the interval estimation procedure being pseudoreplicative, it is not robust to common violations of its assumptions. Because the spatial dispersion of organisms in sampling units from the counting chamber to the field is rarely random and because counting protocols are usually terminated by a count threshold having been equalled or exceeded, Poisson based estimates are usually derived from sampling non-Poisson distributions. Computer simulation was used to investigate the quantitative consequences of such estimates. The expected mean error rate of 95% confidence intervals is inflated from 5% to 15% as contagion increases, as the parametric variance-mean ratio increases from 1 to 2. Also, count threshold termination of the counting protocol effects both a biased estimate of the parametric mean (or total) and alters expected mean error rates, especially if the total count is low (< 100 organisms) and the mean density in the sampling unit is low.