SEDATION DURING SPINAL-ANESTHESIA - COMPARISON OF PROPOFOL AND MIDAZOLAM

被引:104
作者
WILSON, E
DAVID, A
MACKENZIE, N
GRANT, IS
机构
[1] Department of Anaesthetics, Ninewells Teaching Hospital
关键词
Anaesthetic techniques: sedation; spinal; Anaesthetics i.v.: propofol; Hypnotics benzodiazepine: midazolam;
D O I
10.1093/bja/64.1.48
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Propofol and midazolam were compared in 40 patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery under spinal anaesthesia. An infusion of either 1% propofol or 0.1% midazolam was given at a rate adjusted to maintain a similar level of sedation. The mean time to reach this required level was similar in both groups. Quality and ease of control of sedation were good in all patients. A mean infusion rate of 3.63 mg kg-1 h-1 was required for propofol and 0.26 mg kg-1 h-1 for midazolam. Immediate recovery, as judged by ability to open eyes and recall date of birth, was significantly more rapid following propofol (P < 0.0001). Similarly, restoration of higher mental function was significantly faster following propofol, measured by choice reaction time and critical flicker fusion threshold. Amnesia for the immediate postoperative period was significantly greater after midazolam (P = 0.0001). © 1990 Copyright: 1990 British Journal of Anaesthesia.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 52
页数:5
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]   HEMODYNAMIC AND HEART-RATE REFLEX RESPONSES TO PROPOFOL IN THE RABBIT - COMPARISON WITH ALTHESIN [J].
BLAKE, DW ;
JOVER, B ;
MCGRATH, BP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1988, 61 (02) :194-199
[2]   PSYCHOMOTOR FUNCTION AND PSYCHOACTIVE-DRUGS [J].
HINDMARCH, I .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1980, 10 (03) :189-209
[3]  
HINDMARCH I, 1987, ASPECTS RECOVERY ANA, P113
[4]   PROPOFOL FOR INTRAVENOUS SEDATION [J].
MACKENZIE, N ;
GRANT, IS .
ANAESTHESIA, 1987, 42 (01) :3-6
[5]  
NEGUS JB, 1988, ANESTHESIOLOGY S, V69, P711