LATENT INHIBITION IS UNAFFECTED BY DIRECT DOPAMINE AGONISTS

被引:35
作者
FELDON, J
SHOFEL, A
WEINER, I
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv, Tel-Aviv
关键词
APOMORPHINE; QUINPIROLE; SKF-38393; LATENT INHIBITION; CONDITIONED SUPPRESSION; RAT;
D O I
10.1016/0091-3057(91)90283-8
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Latent inhibition (LI) refers to the finding that nonreinforced preexposure to a stimulus retards subsequent conditioning to that stimulus when it is paired with reinforcement. The development of LI reflects a process of learning not to attend, or ignore, irrelevant stimuli. Previous experiments showed that LI was disrupted by low but not high doses of amphetamine, and facilitated by neuroleptic drugs. The present experiments sought to investigate the role of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in LI disruption. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that the selective D1 agonist, SKF-38393 (1, 5, 10 mg/kg) and the selective D2 agonist, quinpirole (0.1, 0.3, 1.0 mg/kg), did not affect LI. Experiment 3 showed that both low (0.3 mg/kg) and high (1.5 mg/kg) doses of the mixed D1-D2 agonist, apomorphine, failed to affect LI. These results show that LI is not disrupted by direct stimulation of DA receptors and suggest that the differential effect exerted on this phenomenon by apomorphine (and possibly SKF-38393 and quinpirole) and amphetamine is related to the direct versus the indirect agonist action of these drugs. In addition, apomorphine at the dose of 0.03 mg/kg, which is believe to activate preferentially DA autoreceptors, did not produce neuroleptic-like facilitation of LI. The implications of the results for the involvement of DA mechanisms in LI are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 314
页数:6
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   RESPONSES TO APOMORPHINE, AMPHETAMINE, AND NEUROLEPTICS IN SCHIZOPHRENIC SUBJECTS [J].
ANGRIST, B ;
ROTROSEN, J ;
GERSHON, S .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1980, 67 (01) :31-38
[2]   THE DISORDER OF CONSCIOUSNESS IN SCHIZOPHRENIA [J].
ANSCOMBE, R .
SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 1987, 13 (02) :241-260
[3]   RELATIVE DOPAMINE D1 AND D2 RECEPTOR AFFINITY AND EFFICACY DETERMINE WHETHER DOPAMINE AGONISTS INDUCE HYPERACTIVITY OR ORAL STEREOTYPY IN RATS [J].
ARNT, J ;
BOGESO, KP ;
HYTTEL, J ;
MEIER, E .
PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 1988, 62 (03) :121-130
[4]  
ARNT J, 1987, STRUCTURE FUNCTION D, P199
[5]   DIFFERENTIAL PERFORMANCE OF ACUTE AND CHRONIC-SCHIZOPHRENICS IN A LATENT INHIBITION TASK [J].
BARUCH, I ;
HEMSLEY, DR ;
GRAY, JA .
JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, 1988, 176 (10) :598-606
[6]   ACUTE REDUCTION OF DOPAMINE LEVELS ALTERS RESPONSES OF BASAL GANGLIA NEURONS TO SELECTIVE D-1 AND D-2 DOPAMINE RECEPTOR STIMULATION [J].
CARLSON, JH ;
BERGSTROM, DA ;
DEMO, SD ;
WALTERS, JR .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1988, 152 (03) :289-300
[7]  
CARLSSON A, 1975, CHEMICAL TOOLS CATEC, V2, P219
[8]   HALOPERIDOL ENHANCEMENT OF LATENT INHIBITION - RELATION TO THERAPEUTIC ACTION [J].
CHRISTISON, GW ;
ATWATER, GE ;
DUNN, LA ;
KILTS, CD .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1988, 23 (07) :746-749
[9]   REVIEW - D1 DOPAMINE RECEPTOR - THE SEARCH FOR A FUNCTION - A CRITICAL-EVALUATION OF THE D1/D2 DOPAMINE RECEPTOR CLASSIFICATION AND ITS FUNCTIONAL IMPLICATIONS [J].
CLARK, D ;
WHITE, FJ .
SYNAPSE, 1987, 1 (04) :347-388
[10]   ANATOMICAL ANALYSIS OF THE INVOLVEMENT OF MESOLIMBOCORTICAL DOPAMINE IN THE LOCOMOTOR STIMULANT ACTIONS OF D-AMPHETAMINE AND APOMORPHINE [J].
CLARKE, PBS ;
JAKUBOVIC, A ;
FIBIGER, HC .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1988, 96 (04) :511-520