Long-term energy use and economic evaluation of three tillage systems for cereal and legume production in central Spain

Three different experiments have been carried out in the area to the northeast of Madrid (central Spain) over 10 years with winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), winter barley (Hordeum vulgare L.),. spring barley and vetch (Vicia saliva L.) grown for hay. In these experiments, three tillage systems were compared: conventional tillage (primary tillage was mouldboard ploughing to 300 mm depth), minimum tillage (primary tillage was spring tine cultivation either with a chisel or a cultivator to 150 mm depth) and zero tillage (direct drilling), in relation to energy consumption, production costs, energy efficiency and productivity, and economic returns. The experiments were performed on a Vertic Haploxeralf of a clay loam texture. The aforementioned variables were calculated considering every input (i.e. fertilisers, seeds, herbicides, machinery and fuel) including all the labour practices performed to harvesting. Post-harvesting activities were not included. The results showed that important energy and production cost savings may be achieved through minimum tillage and zero tillage, compared with conventional tillage. These energy savings ranged from 7 to 11% for cereal crops, whereas for vetch crops the reduction was 10% for minimum tillage and 15% for zero tillage. Production costs for minimum tillage were 13-24% less than for conventional tillage. For zero tillage these reductions ranged from 6 to 17%. For cereal crops, minimum tillage and zero tillage had energy productivities which were 18% and 20%, respectively, greater than that for conventional tillage. In most cases, yields of winter crops were similar, regardless of the tillage system considered. Only spring barley showed lower yields with zero tillage. For winter cereals the profitability with minimum tillage and zero tillage is higher than that with conventional tillage. However, spring barley is less profitable when using zero tillage.