THE SUBTLETY OF ALKYLATING-AGENTS IN REACTIONS WITH BIOLOGICAL MACROMOLECULES

被引:65
作者
VOGEL, EW
NIVARD, MJM
机构
[1] Medical Genetics Centre South-West Netherlands-MGC, Department of Radiation Genetics and Chemical Mutagenesis, Sylvius Laboratory, 2300 RA Leiden
来源
MUTATION RESEARCH | 1994年 / 305卷 / 01期
关键词
ALKYLATING AGENTS; NUCLEOPHILE SELECTIVITY; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;
D O I
10.1016/0027-5107(94)90123-6
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Genotoxic agents known to modify DNA by alkylation reactions (alkylating agents, AAs), either directly or after metabolic conversion to ultimately reactive intermediates, by no means represent a homogeneous class. For instance, their effectiveness for genotoxic damage, when expressed as the number of events (e.g., mutations) per unit exposure dose, varies over a more than 1-million-fold range in dose. Despite the multiplicity of chemical and biological processes involved between DNA adduct formation and expression of genotoxic damage, the principal aims of studies on structure-activity relationships (SARs) are to (a) dissect the multi-step process of genetic damage formation into its most essential components, (b) use SARs for making predictions and, at a later step (c) as a basis for regulatory measures. The analytical tools available for such a comprehensive analysis in eukaryotic systems include determination of multiple genetic endpoints: molecular mutation spectra, relative clastogenicity (clastogenic events in relation to forward mutation induction) and the quantitative measure of enhanced mutagenicity in repair-deficient conditions. The genetic activity profiles obtained in this way can then be compared with fundamental physico-chemical properties of the AAs under consideration (such as Swain-Scott's s value, a useful indicator of the selectivity of an AA in its reactions with nucleophiles of distinct nucleophilic strength n in DNA, RNA and proteins), their functionality (monofunctional versus cross-linking) and their tumorigenic potency (TD(50)s compared with measures of initial DNA interaction, i.e., O-6-/N7-alkylguanine ratios, s values or the covalent binding index determined in the liver in vivo). The combination of these different methods revealed that carcinogenic potencies of AAs in rodents vary over a 10,000-fold range in dose, with the extremes having the following characteristics: (i) Chemicals of a relatively ''high carcinogenic potency'', as indicated by a low TD50 in rodents, either have low nucleophilic selectivity (and therefore mainly act through O-alkylation in DNA) or are capable of cross-linking DNA. The monofunctional members of this group, typified by N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea, are active in both spermatogonia and post-spermatogonial stages in the mouse and in Drosophila. Cross-linking agents also have a low TD50 value in rodents but are expected generally not to display genetic action in premeiotic stages (exceptions mitomycin C and chlorambucil). (ii) A relatively low carcinogenic potential is associated with AAs of high Swain-Scott s values, typified by trimethyl phosphate, epichlorohydrin or methyl methanesulphonate. Efficient error-free repair of N-alkylation damage appears the responsible mechanism for their high TD,, in rodents and why they tend to be inactive in repair-competent germ cells of the mouse. Since AAs of high s values give relatively high degrees of alkylation of proteins (e.g., with the -SH group of esterified cysteine, n = 5.1) reaction products with strong nucleophiles are often formed in amounts orders of magnitude larger than the products at n = 2 (DNA). As a consequence, the ''window'' of the dose range not causing cell lethality but, at the same time, still producing a significant amount of damage (e.g., mutations) will be very small. These type of agents are expected to be ''trouble-makers'' particularly in the in vivo mutagenicity assays. Examples are acrolein, chloroethyl isocyanate, chloroethylene oxide (s = 0.71), epichlorohydrin (s = 0.93), 1,2-epoxybutane, methyl bromide (s = 1.0), methyl iodide (s = 1.20), methyl vinylsulphone and 2-oxopropyl methanesulphonate (s = 2).
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 32
页数:20
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]  
AGUIRREZABALAGA I, 1992, 22ND EEMS M BERL
[2]   CORRELATION BETWEEN CARCINOGENIC POTENCY OF CHEMICALS IN ANIMALS AND HUMANS [J].
ALLEN, BC ;
CRUMP, KS ;
SHIPP, AM .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1988, 8 (04) :531-544
[3]   MUTAGENICITY TO SALMONELLA, DROSOPHILA AND THE MOUSE BONE-MARROW OF THE HUMAN ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT FOTEMUSTINE - PREDICTION OF CARCINOGENIC POTENCY [J].
ASHBY, J ;
VOGEL, EW ;
TINWELL, H ;
CALLANDER, RD ;
SHUKER, DEG .
MUTATION RESEARCH, 1993, 286 (01) :101-109
[4]   DEFINITIVE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG CHEMICAL-STRUCTURE, CARCINOGENICITY AND MUTAGENICITY FOR 301 CHEMICALS TESTED BY THE UNITED-STATES NTP [J].
ASHBY, J ;
TENNANT, RW .
MUTATION RESEARCH, 1991, 257 (03) :229-306
[5]   CHEMICAL-STRUCTURE, SALMONELLA MUTAGENICITY AND EXTENT OF CARCINOGENICITY AS INDICATORS OF GENOTOXIC CARCINOGENESIS AMONG 222 CHEMICALS TESTED IN RODENTS BY THE UNITED-STATES NCI/NTP [J].
ASHBY, J ;
TENNANT, RW .
MUTATION RESEARCH, 1988, 204 (01) :17-115
[6]   MICRONUCLEATED RETICULOCYTE INDUCTION BY ETHYLATING AGENTS IN MICE [J].
ASITA, AO ;
HAYASHI, M ;
KODAMA, Y ;
MATSUOKA, A ;
SUZUKI, T ;
SOFUNI, T .
MUTATION RESEARCH, 1992, 271 (01) :29-37
[7]   NUCLEOPHILIC SELECTIVITY AS A DETERMINANT OF CARCINOGENIC POTENCY (TD50) IN RODENTS - A COMPARISON OF MONO-FUNCTIONAL AND BI-FUNCTIONAL ALKYLATING-AGENTS AND VINYL-CHLORIDE METABOLITES [J].
BARBIN, A ;
BARTSCH, H .
MUTATION RESEARCH, 1989, 215 (01) :95-106
[8]  
BARBIN A, 1986, IARC SCI PUBL, V70
[9]   QUANTITATIVE COMPARISON OF CARCINOGENICITY, MUTAGENICITY AND ELECTROPHILICITY OF 10 DIRECT-ACTING ALKYLATING-AGENTS AND OF THE INITIAL O-6-7-ALKYLGUANINE RATIO IN DNA WITH CARCINOGENIC POTENCY IN RODENTS [J].
BARTSCH, H ;
TERRACINI, B ;
MALAVEILLE, C ;
TOMATIS, L ;
WAHRENDORF, J ;
BRUN, G ;
DODET, B .
MUTATION RESEARCH, 1983, 110 (02) :181-219
[10]   DISTRIBUTION OF METHYL AND ETHYL ADDUCTS FOLLOWING ALKYLATION WITH MONOFUNCTIONAL ALKYLATING-AGENTS [J].
BERANEK, DT .
MUTATION RESEARCH, 1990, 231 (01) :11-30