USE OF A DATABASE COMPUTER-PROGRAM TO IDENTIFY TRENDS IN REPORTING OF ADVERSE DRUG-REACTIONS

被引:15
作者
JOHNSTON, PE
MORROW, JD
BRANCH, RA
机构
[1] VANDERBILT UNIV,DEPT MED,NASHVILLE,TN 37240
[2] VANDERBILT UNIV,DEPT PHARMACOL,NASHVILLE,TN 37240
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY | 1990年 / 47卷 / 06期
关键词
Administration; Computers; Database; Drugs; adverse reactions; Food and Drug Administration (U.S.); Nurses; Pharmacy; institutional; hospital; Quality assurance; Records; Reports;
D O I
10.1093/ajhp/47.6.1321
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
A computerized system for concurrent monitoring and reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in a university hospital is described. The program, which began in 1988, was developed in collaboration with the hospital's pharmacy and therapeutics committee and quality assurance committee. Quality assurance nurses review patients' charts every three days during hospitalization; if an ADR is detected, the nurse completes an ADR report form. A computer database is used to sort and store 15 data elements taken from each ADR form. Individual pharmacists and hospital review committees evaluate the recorded ADRs. The database can present the data for analysis by different variables such as patient age, clinical services, and implicated drugs. Retrieval of such data permits easier evaluation of trends in ADR reports and identification of reactions that should be reported to FDA. Educational programs for staff members can be targeted to address problems occurring within the institution. During the first nine months of the program 340 ADRs were reported; 15 reports were submitted to FDA, and serious problems were reviewed at medical grand rounds. A bimonthly newsletter that reviews recently reported ADRs was begun. The monitoring program has facilitated rapid detection and evaluation of ADRs.
引用
收藏
页码:1321 / 1327
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   IMPACT OF A DRUG BULLETIN ON PRESCRIBING ORAL ANALGESICS IN A TEACHING HOSPITAL [J].
BERBATIS, CG ;
MAHER, MJ ;
PLUMRIDGE, RJ ;
STOELWINDER, JU ;
ZUBRICK, SR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 1982, 39 (01) :98-100
[2]   SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF 3 METHODS OF DETECTING ADVERSE DRUG-REACTIONS [J].
BERRY, LL ;
SEGAL, R ;
SHERRIN, TP ;
FUDGE, KA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 1988, 45 (07) :1534-1539
[3]   ADVERSE-DRUG-REACTION MONITORING [J].
FAICH, GA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1986, 314 (24) :1589-1592
[4]  
JOHNSTON PE, 1989, TENN PHARM, V25, P28
[5]   MULTIDISCIPLINARY PROGRAM FOR DETECTING AND EVALUATING ADVERSE DRUG-REACTIONS [J].
KEITH, MR ;
BELLANGERMCCLEERY, RA ;
FUCHS, JE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 1989, 46 (09) :1809-1812
[6]   IMPROVED REPORTING OF ADVERSE DRUG-REACTIONS [J].
KIMELBLATT, BJ ;
YOUNG, SH ;
HEYWOOD, PM ;
MANDALA, AR ;
GENDELMAN, S ;
MEHL, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 1988, 45 (05) :1086-1089
[7]   IMPACT AND COST JUSTIFICATION OF A SURGERY DRUG NEWSLETTER [J].
MAY, JR ;
ANDRUSKO, KT ;
DIPIRO, JT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 1984, 41 (09) :1837-1839
[8]  
Michelson P A, 1987, Hosp Pharm, V22, P682
[9]   A METHOD FOR ESTIMATING THE PROBABILITY OF ADVERSE DRUG-REACTIONS [J].
NARANJO, CA ;
BUSTO, U ;
SELLERS, EM ;
SANDOR, P ;
RUIZ, I ;
ROBERTS, EA ;
JANECEK, E ;
DOMECQ, C ;
GREENBLATT, DJ .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1981, 30 (02) :239-245
[10]  
STEWART RB, 1986, HDB I PHARM PRACTICE