AN INITIAL COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF 2 TECHNIQUES OF LAPAROSCOPIC COLONIC ANASTOMOSIS AND MESENTERIC DEFECT CLOSURE

被引：8

作者：

COHEN, SM

CLEM, MF

WEXNER, SD

JAGELMAN, DG

机构：

[1] Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Ft. Lauderdale, 33309-1743, FL

[2] Ethicon Endosurgery Institute, Cincinnati, OH

来源：

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 1994年 / 8卷 / 02期

关键词：

LAPAROTOMY; LAPAROSCOPY; COLECTOMY; ANASTOMOSIS; COLORECTAL SURGERY;

D O I：

10.1007/BF00316626

中图分类号：

R61 [外科手术学];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery is still in its nascent stages of development. The ease, efficacy, and safety of intracorporeal mechanical colonic anastomosis are contingent upon expensive stapling devices. Although mobilization and mesenteric division are feasible, a method of inexpensive rapid anastomosis is not. A single inexpensive multifire stapler which could be used both to fashion the anastomosis and to close the mesenteric defect would be ideal. Therefore, this prospective randomized study was undertaken to compare the clinical and functional results of laparoscopic colotomy closure performed using the Endopath EMS hernia stapler (EMS; Ethicon Endosurgery Inc., Cincinnati, OH) to results of using standard two-layer hand suturing (HS). Both the colotomy itself and the mesenteric defect closure sites were included in the randomization and analysis. The abdominal cavity was assessed for evidence of anastomotic leakage, abscess, and adhesion formation. In addition, radiographic luminal diameter, bursting strength, and histology were evaluated. Eight healthy pigs were randomized to either the EMS (N = 4) or HS (N = 4). There was no evidence of leakage, abscesses, or adhesion formation in either group; however, the mesenteric defect revealed more scarring in the HS than in the EMS animals. There were no significant differences in either luminal diameter (HS: mean = 0.92 cm; EMS: mean = 0.91 cm) or bursting strength (HS: mean = 171 mm Hg; EMS: mean = 157 mm Hg) (P > 0.05). Histologic analysis also demonstrated no difference in inflammation, necrosis, or fibrosis. This study suggests that this technique can be safely applied to both colotomy closure and mesenteric defect repair. Clinical, histopathologic, and functional results after EMS closure are comparable to standard (HS) closure. Reproduction of this inexpensive means of safe, cost-effective, intracorporeal anastomosis and mesenteric closure should be pursued in human clinical trials.

引用

页码：130 / 134

页数：5

共 12 条

[1]

Bailey H.R., Lavoo J.W., Max E., Smith K.W., Butts D.R., Hampton J.M., Single-layer polypropylene colorectal anastomosis

[2]

experience with 1001 cases, Dis Colon Rectum, 27, 1, pp. 19-23, (1984)

[3]

Binderow S.R., Klapper A.S., Butalin B., Hernioscopy: Laparoscopy via an inguinal hernia sac, J Laparoendosc Surg, 2, 5, pp. 229-233, (1992)

[4]

Dubois F., Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Historical perspective and personal experience, Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1, pp. 2-7, (1991)

[5]

Falk P.M., Beart R.W., Wexner S.D., Thorson A.G., Jagelman D.G., Lavery I.C., Johansen U.B., Fitzgibbons R.J., Laparoscopic colectomy: a critical appraisal, Dis Colon Rectum, 36, pp. 28-34, (1993)

[6]

Geis W.P., Miller C.E., Kokoszka J.S., Ferlman J.C., Teresi M., Saletta J.D., Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: rationale and technical aspect, Contemp Surg, 40, pp. 13-19, (1992)

[7]

Gotz F., Pier A., Bacher C., Modified laparoscopic appendectomy in surgery, Surg Endosc, 4, pp. 6-9, (1992)

[8]

Nogueras J.J., Wexner S.D., Laparoscopic colon resection, Perspect Colon Rectal Surg, 5, 1, pp. 79-97, (1992)

[9]

A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, N Engl J Med, 324, pp. 1073-1078, (1991)

[10]

Wetherall A.P., Cooper G.J., Ryan J.M., Taylor D.E.M., Howell G.P., Rice P., Use of disposable skin taplers for bowel anastomosis to reduce laparotomy time in war, Ann Coll Surg Engl, 74, pp. 200-204, (1992)

← 1 2 →