CONCURRENT SCHEDULES - UNDERMATCHING AND CONTROL BY PREVIOUS EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS

被引:37
作者
DAVISON, MC
HUNTER, IW
机构
关键词
concurrent schedules; hysteresis; pecking; pigeons; transition performance; undermatching; variable‐interval schedules;
D O I
10.1901/jeab.1979.32-233
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Five pigeons were trained on concurrent variable‐interval schedules. A series of conditions in which the ratio of reinforcement rates on two keys was progressively increased and then decreased was arranged twice. The birds were then exposed to an irregular sequence of conditions. Each condition in which reinforcement was available on both keys lasted six sessions. Performance in the first, third, and sixth sessions after a condition change was analyzed. Following a condition change, preference was biased toward the preference in the last condition, but this effect largely disappeared before the sixth session of training. The birds' preferences also appeared less sensitive to reinforcement rates in early sessions after a transition. Preference in a session was a function of both the reinforcements in that session and the reinforcements obtained in as many as four or five previous sessions. The effects of reinforcements in previous sessions could be summarized by the performance in the immediately preceding session, giving a relatively simple relation between present performance and a combination of present reinforcement and prior session performance. While such hysteresis could cause undermatching when only a small number of sessions are arranged in a condition, undermatching in a stable‐state performance probably arises elsewhere. 1979 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 244
页数:12
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
BAUM WM, 1972, PSYCHON SCI, V28, P263
[2]   CHOICE AS TIME ALLOCATION [J].
BAUM, WM ;
RACHLIN, HC .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1969, 12 (06) :861-&
[3]   2 TYPES OF DEVIATION FROM MATCHING LAW - BIAS AND UNDERMATCHING [J].
BAUM, WM .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1974, 22 (01) :231-242
[5]  
DEVILLIERS P, 1977, HDB OPERANT BEHAVIOR
[6]   CHOICE BEHAVIOR AND ACCESSIBILITY OF REINFORCER [J].
FANTINO, E ;
DELBRUCK, N ;
SQUIRES, N ;
PETERSON, C .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1972, 18 (01) :35-+
[7]  
FERGUSON GA, 1976, STATISTICAL ANAL PSY
[9]   PREFERENCE FOR QUALITATIVELY DIFFERENT REINFORCERS [J].
HOLLARD, V ;
DAVISON, MC .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1971, 16 (03) :375-&
[10]   RESPONSE RATE AND CHANGEOVER PERFORMANCE ON CONCURRENT VARIABLE-INTERVAL SCHEDULES [J].
HUNTER, IW ;
DAVISON, MC .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1978, 29 (03) :535-556