APERIODIC SERVERS IN A DEADLINE SCHEDULING ENVIRONMENT

A real-time system may have tasks with soft deadlines, as well as hard deadlines. While earliest-deadline-first scheduling is effective for hard-deadline tasks, applying it to soft-deadline tasks may waste schedulable processor capacity or sacrifice average response time. Better average response time may be obtained, while still guaranteeing hard deadlines, with an aperiodic server. Three scheduling algorithms for aperiodic servers are described, and schedulability tests are derived for them. A simulation provides performance data for these three algorithms on random aperiodic tasks. The performances of the deadline aperiodic servers are compared with those of several alternatives, including background service, a deadline polling server, and rate-monotonic servers, and with estimates based on the M/M/1 queueing model. This adds to the evidence in support of deadline scheduling, versus fixed priority scheduling.