PREVENTION OF COLORECTAL-CANCER BY ONCE-ONLY SIGMOIDOSCOPY

被引:324
作者
ATKIN, WS
CUZICK, J
NORTHOVER, JMA
WHYNES, DK
机构
[1] IMPERIAL CANC RES FUND,DEPT MATH STAT & EPIDEMIOL,POB 123,LINCOLNS INN FIELDS,LONDON WC2A 3PX,ENGLAND
[2] ST MARKS HOSP,IMPERIAL CANC RES FUND,COLORECTAL UNIT,LONDON EC1V 2PS,ENGLAND
[3] UNIV NOTTINGHAM,DEPT ECON,NOTTINGHAM NG7 2RD,ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0140-6736(93)90499-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
There is no national screening programme for colorectal cancer in the UK despite the fact that the annual death toll from this disease exceeds that of breast and cervical cancer. Faecal occult blood testing (FOBT) is under evaluation for screening, but screening by sigmoidoscopy is not considered viable. This situation contrasts with the USA where both annual FOBT and screening by flexible sigmoidoscopy every 3 to 5 years are recommended from 50 years old. We seek to demonstrate that most of the benefit from the US screening policy would accrue from a single flexible sigmoidoscopy examination at age 55 to 60 years with appropriate colonoscopic surveillance for the 3% to 5% found to have high-risk adenomas (greater-than-or-equal-to 1 cm or villous histology). If applied nationally, this screening regimen could prevent about 5500 colorectal cancer cases and 3500 deaths in the UK each year, thus saving 40 000 years of life. We estimate that there would be little net cost to the National Health Service because savings obtained from treating fewer patients would largely off set the cost of screening. We recommend that a randomised trial to evaluate screening by single flexible sigmoidoscopy should start without delay. Such a trial would involve about 120000 participants, and 15 years of follow-up would be required to obtain a clear answer on mortality, although information on incidence reduction would be available sooner.
引用
收藏
页码:736 / 740
页数:5
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]
HEMOCCULT SCREENING IN DETECTING COLORECTAL NEOPLASM - SENSITIVITY, SPECIFICITY, AND PREDICTIVE VALUE - LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP IN A LARGE GROUP-PRACTICE SETTING [J].
ALLISON, JE ;
FELDMAN, R ;
TEKAWA, IS .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1990, 112 (05) :328-333
[2]
LONG-TERM RISK OF COLORECTAL-CANCER AFTER EXCISION OF RECTOSIGMOID ADENOMAS [J].
ATKIN, WS ;
MORSON, BC ;
CUZICK, J .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 326 (10) :658-662
[3]
DAY NE, 1985, LANCET, V1, P280
[4]
SCREENING FOR COLORECTAL-CANCER [J].
EDDY, DM .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1990, 113 (05) :373-384
[5]
FOLEY DP, 1987, GUT, V28, pA1367
[6]
FLEXIBLE SIGMOIDOSCOPY MAY BE INEFFECTIVE FOR SECONDARY PREVENTION OF COLORECTAL-CANCER IN ASYMPTOMATIC, AVERAGE-RISK MEN [J].
FOUTCH, PG ;
MAI, H ;
PARDY, K ;
DISARIO, JA ;
MANNE, RK ;
KERR, D .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1991, 36 (07) :924-928
[7]
MULTIPHASIC HEALTH CHECK-UP EVALUATION - A 16-YEAR FOLLOW-UP [J].
FRIEDMAN, GD ;
COLLEN, MF ;
FIREMAN, BH .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1986, 39 (06) :453-463
[8]
UNIVARIATE AND MULTIVARIATE ANALYSES OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ADENOCARCINOMA AND SOLITARY AND MULTIPLE ADENOMAS IN COLORECTAL ADENOMA PATIENTS [J].
GATTESCHI, B ;
COSTANTINI, M ;
BRUZZI, P ;
MERLO, F ;
TORCOLI, R ;
NICOLO, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1991, 49 (04) :509-512
[9]
GILBERTSEN VA, 1978, CANCER, V41, P1137, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197803)41:3<1137::AID-CNCR2820410350>3.0.CO
[10]
2-G