RECONCILING VOTERS BEHAVIOR WITH LEGISLATIVE TERM LIMITS

被引:59
作者
DICK, AR
LOTT, JR
机构
[1] UNIV PENN,WHARTON SCH,PHILADELPHIA,PA 19104
[2] UNIV CALIF LOS ANGELES,DEPT ECON,LOS ANGELES,CA 90024
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0047-2727(93)90057-Z
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper provides an efficiency explanation for why rational voters simultaneously re-elect their incumbents and vote for term limits. Our explanation focuses upon a free-riding problem that voters face in choosing their political representatives. Even when all districts would benefit from replacing their political representatives, any individual district will find it costly to remove its own incumbent whose long tenure in office has made him skilled at directing government wealth transfers. Term limits offer voters a way to coordinate their actions and overcome this free-riding problem. Placing a limit on the tenure of all representatives ensures that no one district will benefit at the expense of other districts when their representative is removed from office. The argument also provides an explanation for why increased government transfers increases the length of tenure. As transfers increase, it becomes more costly to reduce the relative tenure of your representative.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
ASCH P, 1983, IND ORG ANTITRUST PO
[2]   THE INFLUENCE OF IDEOLOGY ON CONGRESSIONAL VOTING [J].
BENDER, B .
ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 1991, 29 (03) :416-428
[3]  
BENDER B, 1990, REEXAMINATION PRINCI
[4]   REPRESENTATION AND INFLUENCE - A REPLY [J].
CRAIN, WM ;
TOLLISON, RD .
JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 1981, 10 (01) :215-219
[5]  
CRAIN WM, 1986, AM ECON REV, V76, P833
[6]   STRUCTURE AND STABILITY OF POLITICAL MARKETS [J].
CRAIN, WM .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1977, 85 (04) :829-842
[7]   WHY IS THERE A SENIORITY SYSTEM - TO SOLVE AN AGENCY PROBLEM [J].
DAVIS, ML .
PUBLIC CHOICE, 1990, 66 (01) :37-50
[8]  
GALLUP G, 1990, GALLUP POLL MONT NOV, P25
[9]  
GIBBS N, 1990, TIME 1119, P32
[10]  
GOFF BL, 1990, MIS MEASUREMENT LEGI