GEOID UNDULATION ACCURACY

被引:11
作者
RAPP, RH
机构
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING | 1993年 / 31卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1109/36.214912
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The determination of the geoid, and equipotential surface of the Earth's gravity field, has long been of interest to geodesists and oceanographers. The geoid provides a surface to which the actual ocean surface can be compared with the differences implying information on the circulation patterns of the oceans. For use in oceanographic applications the geoid is ideally needed to a high accuracy and to a high resolution. There are applications that require geoid undulation information to an accuracy of +/- 10 cm with a resolution of 50 km. We are far from this goal today but substantial improvement in geoid determination has been made. In 1979 the cumulative geoid undulation error to spherical harmonic degree 20 was +/- 1. 4 m for the GEM10 potential coefficient model. Today the corresponding value has been reduced to +/- 25 cm for GEM-T3 or +/- 11 cm for the OSU91A model. Similar improvements are noted by harmonic degree (wave-length) and in resolution. For example, in 1979 satellite potential coefficient models to degree 20 were available while today models to degree 50 exist. Potential coefficient models now exist to degree 360 based on a combination of data types. This paper discusses the accuracy changes that have taken place in the past 12 years in the determination of geoid undulations.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 370
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
CHOVITZ B, 1972, 5TH P S MATH GEOD FL
[2]   GEODETIC AND OCEANOGRAPHIC RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF 1 YEAR OF GEOSAT DATA [J].
DENKER, H ;
RAPP, RH .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 1990, 95 (C8) :13151-+
[3]  
GRAFAREND E, 1993, GEOPHYSICAL INTERPRE
[4]   ERROR VARIANCES-COVARIANCES OF GEM-T1 - THEIR CHARACTERISTICS AND IMPLICATIONS IN GEOID COMPUTATION [J].
HAAGMANS, RHN ;
VANGELDEREN, M .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 1991, 96 (B12) :20011-20022
[5]  
Hwang C., 1991, 414 OH STAT U DEP GE
[6]  
Jekeli C., 1983, Bulletin Geodesique, V57, P10, DOI 10.1007/BF02520909
[7]   GRAVITY MODEL IMPROVEMENT USING GEOS-3 (GEM-9 AND GEM-10) [J].
LERCH, FJ ;
KLOSKO, SM ;
LAUBSCHER, RE ;
WAGNER, CA .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1979, 84 (NB8) :3897-3916
[8]  
LERCH FJ, 1992, NASA104555 GODD SPAC
[9]   GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM TESTING OF GEOIDS COMPUTED FROM GEOPOTENTIAL MODELS AND LOCAL GRAVITY-DATA - A CASE-STUDY [J].
MAINVILLE, A ;
FORSBERG, R ;
SIDERIS, MG .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 1992, 97 (B7) :11137-11147
[10]  
Moritz H, 1967, PHYS GEODESY