APPLICATION OF FUZZY-LOGIC AND NEURAL NETWORKS TO AUTOMATICALLY DETECT FREEWAY TRAFFIC INCIDENTS

被引:40
作者
HSIAO, CH
LIN, CT
CASSIDY, M
机构
[1] School of Engrg., Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN, 479071284
[2] Dept. of Control Engrg., National Chiao-Tung Univ., Hsinchu
[3] Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Univ. Of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720
来源
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-ASCE | 1994年 / 120卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1994)120:5(753)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
To date, efforts to manage freeway congestion have been seriously impeded by the inability to promptly and reliably detect the presence of traffic incidents. Traditional incident-detection algorithms distinguish between congested and uncongested operation by comparing measured traffic-stream parameters with predefined threshold values. Given the range of possible operating conditions in the traffic stream, selecting a single threshold value, and the suitability of that selected threshold, is full of uncertainty. This inherent uncertainty makes fuzzy logic a promising approach to incident detection. A Fuzzy Logic Incident Patrol System (FLIPS) is proposed to solve many of the problems inherent in traditional incident-detection algorithms. The FLIPS combines fuzzy logic with the learning capabilities of neural networks to form a connectionist model. The system can be constructed automatically from training examples to find the optimal input/output membership functions. Threshold values, implicitly obtained by fuzzy-logic rules and membership functions, are treated as dependent variables, which change according to prevailing traffic-stream parameters measured by detectors. The FLIPS avoids the rule-matching time of the inference engine in the traditional fuzzy-logic system. The potential effectiveness of the FLIPS is evaluated using an empirical database collected in Toronto, Canada. Future refinement to the FLIPS are also discussed in this paper.
引用
收藏
页码:753 / 772
页数:20
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Ahmed S.A., Stochastic processes in freeway traffic part II: Incident detection algorithms, Traffic Engrg. And Control, 24, 6-7, pp. 309-310, (1983)
[2]  
Braae M., Rutherford D.A., Fuzzy relations in a control setting, Kybernetes, 7, 3, pp. 185-188, (1978)
[3]  
Chen F.C., Back-propagation neural network for nonlinear self-tuning adaptive control, Proc., IEEE Intelligent Machine, pp. 274-279, (1989)
[4]  
Cook A.R., Cleveland D.E., Detection of freeway capacity-reducing incidents by traffic-stream measurements. Transp. Res. Record, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C, 495, pp. 1-11, (1974)
[5]  
Courage K.G., Levin M., A freeway corridor surveillance, information, and control system. Texas Transp. Inst Texas A&M University, College Station, Res, Rep. 488-8, December, (1968)
[6]  
Dudek C.L., Messer C.J., Incident detection on urban freeways. Transp. Res. Record, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C, 495, pp. 12-24, (1974)
[7]  
Fambro D.B., Ritch G.P., Evaluation of an algorithm for detecting urban freeway incidents during low-volume conditions. Transp. Res. Record, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C, 773, pp. 31-39, (1980)
[8]  
Gall A.I., Hall F.L., Distinguishing between incident congestion and recurrent congestion: A proposed logic. Transp. Res. Record, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C, 1232, pp. 1-8, (1989)
[9]  
Gallant S.I., Connectionist expert systems, Commun. ACM, 31, 1, pp. 152-169, (1988)
[10]  
Hall F.L., Shi Y., George A., On-line testing of the McMaster incident detection algorithm under recurrent congestion, 72Nd Annu. Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C, (1993)